Yes, I agree with that. I think good social relations can improve the humand-kind
skills and so can lead to success in every jobs.
The first step for the success in the every jobs is the ability to handle the associated
works. This handling ability needs a powerful study background so it is not the whole. To success in your job you should be able to relate to the people. The social relations can improve your skills. You can learn many things in your profession which are not exist in the books.
Also if you can relate well with your colleagues they become your friends so in the hardships they can help you to pass the problems. For example in my previous job, I have some difficulties with students who can not barrel the burden of the hard work so my fellows explained their own experiences and advised me with their notefull comments. Therefore they help me to pass the problem and so I reached to success in my job.
Another important result of the social relations can be described in the psychological field. Human impressions are so related
to their environment. The social relations like the energy with positive or negative value. If you exposed your self to the good relations with your surrounding people you can get the more energy and it can lead to increase your self power to solve the problems. With the aim of these energies you can pass the hardships and be a prominent in your job.
In last I can concluded with the power of good social relation you can learn more, pass the hardships and get the more power to work and live well so the social relations is more important rather than studying hard as a fundamental step.
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 85
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 65
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...things in your profession which are not exist in the books. Also if you can relate...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...on which are not exist in the books. Also if you can relate well with your collea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...dvised me with their notefull comments. Therefore they help me to pass the problem and so...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 15, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'conclude'
Suggestion: conclude
...prominent in your job. In last I can concluded with the power of good social relation...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our job. In last I can concluded with the power of good social relation you ca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, well, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 297.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60269360269 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46866335649 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457912457912 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6004361732 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4375 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.53405017921 176% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253006070187 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988248839034 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471476789661 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126700189624 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526021555906 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.