TPO 23 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People show different attitudes towards whether it is worth taking risk making mistakes to increase productivity. In my opinion, I completely agree with the argument that things should be planned and executed deliberately to make sure of their exactness. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, making mistakes is detrimental to the stability and prosperity of a company especially in the current competitive market. A small scandal greatly contributes to the fact that consumers choose other alternatives from other competitors. In the modern market, it is equivalent to the end of the company´s existence and development. Should the company survive, the management of that company may have to hand over a ton of cash to fix the consequences of the errors. For example, various giant German automobile companies have had to dig deep into their pockets to recall millions of cars worldwide as a consequence of their latest diesel-gate scandal. Clients from all over the world were disappointed with this lie and decided to buy cars from Japanese and Korean brands.
Secondly, products or services which lack thorough study and investigation likely bring about serious legal issues for their manufacturers, especially in the pharmaceutical industry. A problematic medicine can do harm or even cause death to thousands of patients. A recent case of a local pharmaceutical company in my country is a compelling example. That manufacturer commercialized a new type of vaccine for newborn babies without a profound medical verification. As a result, various side effects quickly stopped its sales throughout the country. Not only that, the company has faced an extensive number of legal trials and the director has been imprisoned for ten years.
In conclusion, I put my vote to the argument that everything should be tested and checked carefully to avert errors. Otherwise, the provider may bind itself into legal issues or lost its reputation or the business is ruined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die 71
- TPO 22 - Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons. 76
- TPO 33 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and example 86
- TPO 37 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- road safety 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28482972136 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09007487286 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622291021672 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1670351982 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.411764706 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100020326372 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298488391604 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372663547388 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623287514047 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614248526662 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.