TPO 21 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People show different attitudes toward how to succeed in their future careers. While some students think an excellent academic record is the most important factor, in my opinion, I give my vote to the argument that establishing and maintaining good relationships with other people is pivotal in guaranteeing one´s success. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, relating well to people especially your colleagues greatly contributes to your career advancement as they will give you advice or lend you their hands when you get troubles at work. Besides, elder company members who love you may share their valuable knowledge which is not be taught at any college or university. Those kinds of assistance and knowledge are critical for fresh graduates who have little real-life comprehension. My own experience is a compelling example. When I first enjoyed my company ten years ago, I tried to be nice and make friends with various colleagues. During my first year at work, they gave me extensive supports and instructions, especially they taught me how to talk to clients effectively. As a result, I was promoted to management level after four years. I could not reach that incredible achievement without my beloved team-mates.
Secondly, people who have good relationships with you may provide you with precious information like a job offer with better remuneration. In the current competitive society, this advantage plays a crucial role in improving your career. My friend´s experience exemplifies this idea. He worked for his previous company for ten years but had no chance of bettering his position. However, he is a decent man and many of his clients like him. Three years ago, one of his clients notified him about a job vacancy which perfectly matched his background and comes with a higher wage. Therefore, my friend now earns double and he is utterly satisfied with his work. This example shows how important good relationships are.
In conclusion, those above-mentioned arguments and examples put weight to my view that one should develop and sustain fruitful relationships with their colleagues and others so that they can achieve success in their career.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- TPO 29 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 41 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die 71
- TPO 27 - The causes of the Little Ice Age 78
- Intelligent machines like robots will be widely implemented as a replacement for human beings Broach its pros and cons 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16292134831 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96707407978 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601123595506 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.3776088731 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161770003624 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432883326641 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435572445992 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956833310551 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027348344818 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.