There is no shortage of debate about whether work quickly and risky is more important that working with prudence. Without no question, many would think the first idea is the best; others may consider the opposite point of view. As far as I am concerned, I strongly believe that today is more important to work quickly and risky. I feel this way mainly for two reasons I am going to explore in the following essay.
First of all, the advance of technology and global communication are dragging companies into a race of continuous innovations. Moreover, the market's demand is changing so fast that is usual to see unfinished products on the markets with trials that needs numbers of correction. To illustrate this idea, let's consider the following example. No long ago, Microsoft launched the last version of Windows 10 with an alpha prototype. In other words, the product was incomplete and full of "bugs", which is the name provided for mistakes in the program. However, Microsoft decided that relaesing the product and satisfy the market would be better than wait too long loosing their market in the hands of the competitors.
Secondly, the business competition is getting more and more aggressive. In this fashion, selling a product or a service is demanding a great investment in promotion and advertising. By this token, being the first product or service launched in a new niche or market could represent an extraordinary income. My own experience is a compelling example of this point. While I was working for a software company as producer assistance, I could notice how the company adapted to focus in the communication and in the marketing strategics. The communication turned more aggressive and, even though some commercial didn't get the expected results, others achieved a great response from the audience that represented million of dollars of earning for the company.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that today is more important to work quickly and risk other than slow and prudent. I think this way because the advance of technology and global communication increase the market demand and because the competition between business are becoming more aggressive than ever.
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 83
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 83
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 608, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...essive and, even though some commercial didnt get the expected results, others achiev...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, i feel, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1504178273 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9104969715 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537604456825 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6966040804 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.722222222 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17110538603 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577973316389 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707092266349 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117634301871 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600986004248 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.