Comparing with the past, contemporary young generations do spend less time on helping their communities, From what I observed and my own experience, young people have several legitimate reasons to justify their choice.
Firstly, Due to lack of leisure time, young generations do not have much available opportunities to serve their communities. Modern people are forced to be involved into inevitable competitions for all sorts of social resources including high-paying job, better career path. Case is getting more conspicuous when it comes to young people at their age about twenty who are ambitious and in their physical prime. Contemporary educated youngsters are willing to devote large proportion of their time to things that benefit themselves not or in the future. Such as workout for better physical shape and health, working overtime to gain recognition and promotion, attending social events to expand their social milieu. Even for school students, the situation is the same. Competing with other peers for getting enrolled in Ivy League. they certainly have to spend most of their time in academic studying to build up their resume. Clearly, they do not have extra time to be allocated for community service.
In addition, Despite that the young are able to squeeze some leisure time from their daily hectic life, the majority of them seem to show less enthusiasm towards their community. As for this circumstance, entrenched individualism might partly account for it. Individualism, in my perspective, which means individuals are the primary driving force behind the social progression, promote them to pay close attention to their own personal advancement. Few can deny that the desire to better being lies in human nature. Since most of community services fail to provide substantial benefits in essence, it is plain to understand that modern young people are reluctant to spend their valuable leisure time on these.
Further, it is wrong to equate less time spent on community services with less sufficient helps offered by young generations. Some astute young people who care about their community are capable of understanding how to provide effective and time-saving help. For example, in order to improve their communal medical system. They probably prefer to donate money to build a updated system rathe than to be a volunteer in communal hospital, which not only saves their time but provides a more effective solution. In this regard, it is a win-win situation. They can dedicate their time on their personal advancement to earn more financial rewards and then donates part of their money to enhance their communal environment.
In a nutshell, Due to lack of time and changing attitude towards community, youngster indeed do not have or are not willing to devote a large amount of their time to help their community. However, as I mentioned before, substantial assistance form young people is absolutely available.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 90
- TPO 26:Agree/Disagree:It's better for children choose jobs that are similar to their parent' jobs than to choose job that are very different from their parents' jobs. 90
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ers for getting enrolled in Ivy League. they certainly have to spend most of their t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...robably prefer to donate money to build a updated system rathe than to be a volun...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, thus, as for, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2481.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30128205128 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81313055528 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544871794872 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5986767316 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.869565217 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.347826087 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95652173913 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221866539593 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684383066567 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595139212648 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156163316279 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509075136035 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.