Jobs has always been an important issue which engenders a lot of controversial debates among people. One pivotal question is whether someone should wait to find the ideal and perfect job or get a secure job. While most of the people believe that it is better to wait for dream jobs, I hold the opposite point. Ensuing paragraphs will elaborate on my points of view by some astonishing reasons.
First, one of the most pivotal characters of a job is security. Being not worried about losing your job can relieve stress. Thus, you can work in a more peaceful and desirable environment considering that how much perilous effects a stressful situation can have for your health. Also, it increases the yield due to feeling comfortable. When you wait merely for the ideal job it makes you be fussy about choosing a job and starting your career. For instance, one of my friends had a lot of conditions for her ideal job that hardly a job can meet her need. After a while, she became disappointed and also lost her self-confidence however she could not diminish her ideal conditions. In the end, after two years of being unemployed, she started a job not very satisfying.
Second, I believe each job contains a lot of experiences and specific skills increasing your ability. After doing some jobs you obviously became more experts, therefore, finding an ideal job would dramatically become more convenient for you. take a personal example, when I wanted to find a job, I just pay attention that I just find one so found a job very soon. However, it was not ideal enough for me, my duties were so informative. It learned me a lot about computer skills which were helpful for my next job.
to brief, finding a job is a prominent part of life and all aspects of that is challenging and make debates. I think it is better to get a job right away rather than wait for an ideal one due to mentioned reasons. In this way, you relieve your stress and gain lots of experience.
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 73
- Governments should spend more money supporting the arts than supporting athletics such as an Olympic team. 60
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities. 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...tically become more convenient for you. take a personal example, when I wanted to fi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ls which were helpful for my next job. to brief, finding a job is a prominent par...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60857142857 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65468549965 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551428571429 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0869220108 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.65 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283745966992 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887048056235 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697660548765 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182680606732 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012783710262 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.