tpo 29 edmontosaurs
The material discusses the migration of edmontosaurs every winter. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely edmontosaurs should migrate to find food. Next, living in herd could support the hypothesis of migration. Fianlly, edmontosaurs are physically capable to immgrate long distance.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points, one specific contradiction is a hundared years ago the weather in Alask's North Slope are warmer than today; furthermore, in the arcatic region sunsined the whole day during the summer, which provided a good growing condition for plants, and edmontosaurs could live on the dead vegitations during the winter. In addition to that, living in a herd did not mean that edmontosaurs migrated, animals could live in herd for other purposes, such as extra protection from predetors, For example, allthough elks live in herd, they do not migrate. One final poin, young edmontosaurs physically did not able to migrate long distance. Given that edmontosaurs live in herd they could not migrate and leave young one ; moreover, the juvenile edmontosaurs could not survive alone.
In summary, there are many discrepancies in the presented inormation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Christine hanna | 60 | view |
- in the past, it was easier to identify a career that leads to a secure and successful future. 76
- tpo 39 mass-extinction 85
- tpo 54 3
- do you agree or disagree student should have a broad knowledge of subject rather than focus in one academic major? 73
- people today are so busy doing many things, they do few things well? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rd, they do not migrate. One final poin, young edmontosaurs physically did not ab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, regarding, while, for example, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 43.0788530466 14% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1977.66487455 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 203.0 407.700716846 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61083743842 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.48103885553 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92444587889 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 212.727598566 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610837438424 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 618.680645161 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.3722241431 48.9658058833 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 5.45110844103 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146387480392 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697244434734 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553172665152 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778333028512 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501607654507 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.