tpo 33
The material discusses the concept of the main usage of the carved stone balls found in Scotland. While the listening looks at the topic from one perspective, the reading challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding to this topic, namely the carved stone balls might be used as weapons in hunting or fighting. Next, they were used for weighting or measurements. Finally, the carved stone balls represented social purposes.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is if the carved stone balls were used as weapons, they should be cracked or broken. However, they preserve well with no damage. In addition to that, they could not be used in the weighting system, because they did not have uniform sizes. They made from different types of stone stand-stone, green-stone, or quartzite. Each type has a different density and a different weight. As a handful of feathers weight less than a handful of rocks. One final point, the carved stone balls did not serve social purposes, because of two-point. First, some of these balls are intricate, while others are very simple to represent status symbols. Second, the Neolithic buried all their possessions with them when they died; however, there are no balls in tombs or graves. Therefore, the balls could not status symbols.
- do you agree or disagree? the rules that societies expect that young people should follow and obey are too strict 83
- tpo 37 3
- it is better for students to understand ideas and concepts than learning facts 76
- people nowadays spend too much money on their pets although they are better uses of this money agree or disagree 95
- some people believe that schools with the same-age are better, while others think that schools with girls, and boys are more effective? which approach do you prefer? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The material discusses the concept of th...
^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...points outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne balls represented social purposes. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fferent density and a different weight. As a handful of feathers weight less than ...
^^
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re, the balls could not status symbols.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62809854992 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7057973017 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1333333333 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7333333333 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48803399843 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162567445797 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904310125783 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328282474923 0.162205337803 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106263808641 0.0443174109184 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.