Tpo 29, to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
It has long been a hot controversy among contemporary scientists that of the two options of raising the salaries of professors or spending money on other important issues which one is more preferable. As far as I am concerned, answering to this question is imperative, as it deals with the finest way to improve the quality of education. I would not agree that spending more money on earnings for university professors would improve the quality of education dramatically as universities have a limited budget they have to choose the most efficient way to spend. Obviously, there are better ways to do that.
First of all, having up to date laboratories in so many fields such as physic and chemistry is the optimum way to improve the quality of education. A prime example from my own experience may shed some light on this point, I remember, when I was studying my bachelor degree in electrical engineering, we did not have a perfect tool to measure the Voltage accurately in circuits which was very disappointing for students. While so many teachers had luxury cars such as BMW. We did even send an email to the dean of the department but he spontaneously replied we do know that buying a tool for you is necessary, but we do not have the extra budget.
Another pivotal reason would be the unwanted competition between the universities for hiring good professors. The reason for a whole host of students who are dreaming to follow teaching as their career is sacred. Spending more money on salaries of professors would deviate from the paramount goal of teaching to eager young minds. For instance, perfect professors would leave lower budget universities seeking for more money. Personally, I know some professors in my last university who refused to get more money, surprisingly because they think that the extra money would hinder them from their academic research.
The last, but not the least, the more we spend on salaries on professors of university, the more we would ignore the possible undiscovered technologies to improve the quality of teaching. According to a research which was conducted by one of the most reputable universities in my country, the E-learning is the possible way of teaching in the near future. The only way that we can invest on this and be a pioneer on Internet learning is by spending more and more money on this.
To conclude, considering the above reasons, notwithstanding with all snags of spending on other parts of education, we can simply realize that spending money on incomes of professors can serve as a catalyst for an everlasting, detriment and unexpected race among universities.
- Working three days a week for long hours or five days a week for shorter hours which one is better? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 70
- TPO 33Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 80
- The best things in life are free do you agree or disagree 77
- Agree or disagree The most important characteristic of a successful leader or politician is the ability to communicate well 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...ad luxury cars such as BMW. We did even send an email to the dean of the department but he sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, while, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94356659142 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94119751221 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507900677201 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1177799032 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.823529412 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0588235294 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359944033887 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116136887599 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864043728433 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203730256407 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990715219373 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.