Should your government place a tax on the junk food and fatty snacks?
It is no denying the fact that the rate of lifestyle associated diseases has increased compare to the past few decades. If we take a look to people’s lifestyle, we will realize that one of the major things that has been changed is the food that they eat. Nowadays, the majority of people eat fatty and junk foods almost everyday. This unhealthy diet increased the prevalence of some acute diseases like heart attack, stroke and coronary heart disease. Therefore, finding a way to prevent people from eating those unhealthy foods is a hot topic a debate, which is much talked by nutritionists. Some nutritionists believe that one of the most effective ways of decreasing consumption of junk and fatty foods is placing tax on them. Although it is a highly controversial topic, but I agree with them. I tend to believe that placing tax will increase their price and could be a way to encourage people to not use them.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that junk foods are mostly buy by low-salary people. The reason behind this is their low price, which makes them affordable for them. For example, the price of a meal containing a cup of soda, a big burger, and fry potato at McDonald is less than 7 Dollars. This meal can be categorized as a junk and fatty food, but since it is inexpensive people with low salary have a tendency to buy it frequently. Therefore, by placing tax on it, the price of a McDonald’s meal will increase and low-income people will not consider that food as an affordable food to eat everyday. This example shows that applying this policy could be effective to encourage people to not buy junk food, at least it could decrease the frequency of buying them.
Another subtle point that we should deem is the fact that those fatty and junk foods contain chemical preservative, oxidant and toxic compounds and they are poor in vitamins and other essential nutrition. As a result, there are a treat for human’s health. I read a report in the newspaper which claims that every year the USA government spend more than one billion dollars one treatment of diet associated disease. This is a huge financial burden for the government, which is payed by citizen’s tax. If Those diseases are caused because of eating unhealthy foods, therefore I do not think that it would be fair if we the government spend everyone’s tax to cover that cost. Instead, the government should place tax on junk and fatty foods. If some people are not interested in having a healthy lifestyle, why all citizens should pay for her/his health cost?
Overall, due to the aforementioned arguments explored in the previous statements, I believe that placing tax on junk and fatty foods could be an effective policy for reducing their consumption by people.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-18 | Julie.Zhu | 60 | view |
2022-11-17 | 57454751 | 73 | view |
2021-09-16 | reeya kiran | 75 | view |
2021-09-13 | meliiw_amd | 90 | view |
2021-09-13 | hazrat | 90 | view |
- Essay topics: In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in t 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 60
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 96
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 70
- People have different ways of escaping the stress and difficulties of modern life. Some read; some exercise; others work in their gardens. What do you think are the best ways of reducing stress? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 90
the rate of lifestyle associated diseases has increased compare to the past few decades
the rate of lifestyle associated diseases has increased compared to the past few decades
encourage people to not use them.
encourage people not to use them.
junk foods are mostly buy by low-salary people.
junk foods are mostly bought by low-salary people.
encourage people to not buy junk food,
encourage people not to buy junk food,
Sentence: As a result, there are a treat for human's health.
Description: The fragment a treat for is not usually preceded by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is
Sentence: I read a report in the newspaper which claims that every year the USA government spend more than one billion dollars one treatment of diet associated disease.
Description: The fragment government spend more is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace spend with verb, past tense
Sentence: If Those diseases are caused because of eating unhealthy foods, therefore I do not think that it would be fair if we the government spend everyone's tax to cover that cost.
Description: The tag a pronoun, personal, nominative, not 3rd person singular is not usually followed by the
Suggestion: Refer to we and the
Description: The fragment government spend everyone's is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace spend with verb, past tense
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2 //Double check grammar issues after essay writing.
The introduction is too long.
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 485 350
No. of Characters: 2246 1500
No. of Different Words: 224 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.693 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.631 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.573 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.045 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.984 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.306 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.458 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.149 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5