In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
It has long been a hot controversy among contemporary researchers that the future of cars may not be lucid enough. As far as I am concerned, answering to this question is imperative, as it deals with huge investments in car producing by myriad developing countries. I would agree that there would be fewer cars in use, as there are some unsettled issues with current cars such as pollution, lack of material for producing more cars in the future and the human tendency for driving private cars.
First of all, stopping the environment contamination of cars is still an important slogan for green movements around the world. However, there are some efforts by car firms to quench the requests of environment proponents such as producing electrical vehicles or producing more fuel efficient cars. But none of them are good enough to solve completely the true problem caused by cars, as the process of producing even an electrical car can be harmful to nature. According to a research which was conducted by one of the most reputable universities showed producing an electrical car is contaminating 2000 liters of water indirectly.
Another pivotal reason for my prediction is the lack of materials such as Iron and other compositions in twenty years later. For instance, some of the biggest iron mines in my country depleted recently, due to the high demand of iron from car companies. Thus, as the population of the world is highly increasing, firms has to pick another alternative for car's material which would not be as good as iron.
The last, but not the least, the incline for driving cars among new generations are declining. The advertisements and information made by green parties in some countries served as a catalyst to encourage people for using public transportation rather than perspnal cars. A prime example from my own experience may shed some light to this point, a whole host of my friends are determined to use taxi, bus and train instead of cars, as they know the harms of using private cars.
To conclude, considering the above reasons, notwithstanding with all snags of the ever increasing need of new cars, we can simply realize that in twenty years later there would be less aspirations for driving private cars. However, the new technology like electricity cars has broadened, sharpened and depend our knowledge, perception and experience about cars, it should use wisely to serve us properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 70
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 70
- tpo 30, 65
- Some people believe that zoos serve useful functions. Other people believe that it is cruel and wrong to confine in zoos. Tell which point of view you agree with and explain why, using specific and reasons. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the modern world we should never be impolite to another person 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun aspirations is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...at in twenty years later there would be less aspirations for driving private cars. H...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87605016345 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54702970297 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.7844177171 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9333333333 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208783547244 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719698742837 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402022899273 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117194666064 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425377687325 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.