The quality of education can be improved by using myriad other ways not necessarily by spending on salaries of the professors. To my best knowledge, professor's already earn enough money to live a quality life and support their future. I would present couple of arguments through which, quality of education can be improved.
First, Since universities are academic institutions hence, introduction of various academic clubs can engage students in discussions and dialogues of their academic interests. For example, a public policy related school can initiate a policy evaluation club where member students can meet and work upon, public policy related skills and knowledge. In addition to it, establishing such clubs will have least cost associated and students can be encouraged to lead the club. This way leadership capabilities can also be inculcated in the students.
Secondly, to improve the quality of education, universities can increase their allocation on research rather than spending the fiscal budgets on increasing salaries of professors. New research schools can be established and fellows and doctoral students can be inducted in these research schools. This will certainly improve the academic environment in the university. However, doctoral students and fellows need to be paid, yet salaries of both sets of employees can be managed in proposed budget.
Finally, universities should consider organizing student festivals and other extra curricular activities more often. In doing so, students will remain fresh and hence can concentrate more of academic classes when needed. Students do cravings for extra curricular activities. If universities address these then the environment will become more conducive to study and learning as well as quality can be improved at less cost.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 53
- People who make decisions based on emotions and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- ’The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.’ Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or d 66
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...skills and knowledge. In addition to it, establishing such clubs will have least ...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the least'.
Suggestion: have the least
...on to it, establishing such clubs will have least cost associated and students can be enc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 273.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60805860806 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93590143481 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586080586081 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1481119604 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.066666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129859036586 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542444773455 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599824105702 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931453058675 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479867354382 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.