TPO 30: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Working pattern reflects considerably on one's enjoyability. Whereas some people believe that working five days a week for shorter hours is more enjoyable, others disagree. Honestly, I reckon that working just three days per week is more delightful. I feel that way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, working only three times a week enables us to have a long time for pleasure. In other words, time professionals spend tremendously commuting to a workplace can be used, instead, with their families, exercising, or even relaxing.
For example, my husband has been working in a work pattern that allows him to work only three days a week for 10 hours daily. He usually spends like two hours back and forth to reach his workplace. Although he takes about half an hour to rest, he still has more than 10 hours to work. He goes three consecutive days that way, following a vacation for the rest of the week. As a result, he used his vacation for pleasure by going to the gym, visiting his parents, and traveling to some recreation sites with children and friends. Had my husband worked daily, he would have never enjoyed himself that way.
Secondly, working long hours also enhances our performance in completing the jobs that give us a sense of self-achievement and pleasing feeling. There is nothing more enjoyable in the world than feeling that we do well in our careers and see the light of appreciation in our employers for doing the job better than they ever expected. My situation is a vivid example; I work for a famous pharmaceutical company in the R and D department. No one can guarantee that I can finish my work in only eight hours, yet having extra two long hours gives me a feeling of comfort to work continually meticulously with extreme diligence for three days. Therefore, I always finish any project flawlessly and on time. My general manager usually praises me, which gives me a paramount sense of joy and happiness. As you can see, it is clear that working long hours for only three days can help us to do well in our fields and enjoy our success.
In sum, working prolonged hours for three days is more enjoyable than working shorter hours every day. Not only does this working style give us more leisure time to enjoy, but it also allows us to achieve our job flawlessly and happily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 80
- Ambitious dreams are better than realistic goals Agree or disagree 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use specif 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, honestly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, for example, i feel, i reckon, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69007263923 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62871488311 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535108958838 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3186874612 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2380952381 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38095238095 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456701751009 0.236089414692 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141596030064 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103868750603 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266044916998 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620075925439 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.