What an important aspect of human beings' lives which plays a prominent role in their prosperities, to a great extent, is their jobs. Although there is a consequence on its indisputable role, the best way to work is still a moot point. Germane to this fact, a question which is the matter of debate, a controversial one, is whether working three days for long hours is better than working five days for shorter hours. Although some people may be on the belief that working five days a week is more enjoyable, I am personally of the conviction that working three days is far preferable for two conspicuous reasons.
One compelling reason giving in favor of this thesis is that we will enjoy our life more. To elucidate more on this issue, if we work three days a week, we will have more free time, in comparison with working five days a week. We can spend this extra time with our family or do activities that make us happy. For instance, I work in a company three days a week. Therefore, I utilize the other four days of a week to get some rest and go out with my family. Every week, we go to the movies, and after that to a restaurant for lunch. Moreover, I have started learning the piano since last month, which I had always wanted to learn. This taught me that I would not be this much contented with my life and work if it were not because of my three-day week job.
Another reason which cannot go unnoticed is that if we work three days a week, we can save more money. To shed some light on this premise, it is worth pointing out that everyday (every day) that we go to work, we need to spend money on transportation. We need to pay for gas or public transportation. Nonetheless, if we work only for three days a week, we can save money of two days' transportation. As an illustration, according to the results of a research published in an academic journal, Americans virtually spend 10% of their wages on going to work and lunch. This means that people spend a huge amount of money on these costs, and if they go to work two days less, they can save a lot of money. As you can see, people can save more money if they go to work three days a week.
To wrap it up, I am personally one of the proponents who cites a clear bias in favor the idea that working three days a week is more enjoyable than five days a week. To recapitulate the reasons, not only will we enjoy our life more, but also we can have the opportunity to decrease a great deal of our costs. To my way of thinking, everyone should try to find a job where he/she works only three days a week.
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 86
- TPO 31- Integrated Task 86
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 77
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... premise, it is worth pointing out that everyday (every day) that we go to work, we need...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...cans virtually spend 10% of their wages on going to work and lunch. This means that peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to decrease a great deal of our costs. To my way of thinking, everyone should try...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'to a great extent']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209558823529 0.229887763892 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.154411764706 0.158761421928 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0569852941176 0.0866891130778 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0441176470588 0.046263068375 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0772058823529 0.0685040099705 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115808823529 0.118717715034 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0294117647059 0.0351676179071 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49610015631 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0386029411765 0.0309702414327 125% => OK
Particles: 0.00551470588235 0.00188951952338 292% => OK
Determiners: 0.102941176471 0.0887237588012 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0257352941176 0.0209618222197 123% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0147058823529 0.0139019557991 106% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2570.0 2387.08602151 108% => OK
No of words: 488.0 408.028673835 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26639344262 5.86048508987 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48200974243 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.213114754098 0.338922669872 63% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.143442622951 0.251872472559 57% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.104508196721 0.174417080927 60% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0758196721311 0.112833075102 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49610015631 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446721311475 0.524397521467 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.5860767887 59.2087087015 85% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.1818181818 20.5533526081 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1067621132 48.84282405 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.818181818 120.699889404 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.5533526081 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.644075263715 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 36.5260804769 45.7405998639 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.28666666667 1.45489161554 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3810784404 0.300154397459 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.150369674568 0.103427244359 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.1046832904 0.0752933317313 139% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498033617674 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127347699817 0.151897553556 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144564583984 0.114077575197 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738580706764 0.0781384742642 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.376209690077 0.336927656856 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.07338152255 0.067059652881 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266506861803 0.210909579961 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305295490762 0.0618886996521 49% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 8.42114695341 178% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.