TPO 31- Integrated Task
The article passage and professor both discuss the authenticity of theories attributed to Sinosauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur. The author contends that critis opposed the idea that Sinosauropteryx had feathers, stating three conspicuous reasons so as to support. However, the lecturer, having a critical point of view, casts a shadow of doubt on what the author proposes. She explains that there are strong evidences that support the theory that they had feathers and the arguments in the reading passage are not convincing, and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the author claims that the pattern o lines surrounding the skeleton bones may were formed after the animal's death. On the contrary, the professor, not having been convinced, delcares that it is unlikely that the lines are results of decomposition. She proceeds to state that decompostion of fossils of other animals burried in the same cite show that the functional parts of animals are preserved in ash. Therefore, it is likely that ash well preserved functional structures of Sinosauropteryx, e.g. feathers.
Second, the author posits that the lines are fossilized remains of frills. The lecturer opposes this point, stating that there are evidences that show they are not remains of frills. To elucidate more on this issue, she explains that the chemical compostion of frills is different with feathes. Feathers have a huge amount of batacrate protein, but feathers do not this much. The analysis shows that these lines have comparaly composition as feathers.
Finally the author highlights the fact that the location of lines are along the backbone and the tail which make the useless for flight and thermoregulation; thus, they were not feathers. However, the professor explains that feathers have other uses. She sheds some light on this premise, stating that birds like picach have feathers along their tail. They spread the feathers to attract males. Furthermore, recently scientists showed that the lines surrounding the skeletal bones where colorful, they were orange and blue. This supports the theory that Sinosauropteryx spread their feather for dispalying.
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern technologyis creating a single world culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hers, stating three conspicuous reasons so as to support. However, the lecturer, having ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...keleton bones may were formed after the animals death. On the contrary, the professor, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...e comparaly composition as feathers. Finally the author highlights the fact that the...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'e.g.', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.280423280423 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.174603174603 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0502645502646 0.0723426182421 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0396825396825 0.0435111971325 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0343915343915 0.0277247811725 124% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124338624339 0.128828473217 97% => OK
Participles: 0.042328042328 0.0370669169778 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84027572889 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0132275132275 0.0208969081088 63% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.126984126984 0.128158765124 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0026455026455 0.0158828679856 17% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0185185185185 0.0114777025283 161% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2155.0 1645.83664459 131% => OK
No of words: 337.0 271.125827815 124% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39465875371 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.406528189911 0.374372842146 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320474777448 0.287516216867 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231454005935 0.187439937562 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139465875371 0.113142543107 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84027572889 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528189910979 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 55.9277256158 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0529801325 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.85 21.7502111507 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7987157346 49.3711431718 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 132.220823453 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.85 21.7502111507 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.878197800319 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 48.8974777448 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.79787234043 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.76487950573 0.549887131256 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114473202843 0.142949733639 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0791463102542 0.0787303798458 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.530826519663 0.631733273073 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.16652658097 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.324457082495 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141636636142 0.103435571967 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.500059750736 0.414875509568 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0323249850107 0.0530846634433 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.601402878991 0.40443939384 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523851197068 0.0528353158467 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.26048565121 211% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.1766004415 252% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 10.2958057395 185% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.