tpo 31
With the advent of technology, life style chenge. people are more deal with technology in compare with pas. This event has really effect on people's life which some of them is helpful but some of them are distractive. Although some people believes that because of the changing which is occure quickly, people aare less happy or less satified with their lives, I think living now is more atractive than the past because of the reasons which will be discussed in details below.
The first and the most reason is that, people who lives now are deal whit more chenges which is helps them to experiens more. However people who lives in the past didn't see a lot of changes so they were had less exiting life. To be more specific, people which are deal with more chaenges experience more thing that is so helpful for their life. So modern people have more better life in compare whit the past. For instance, now we have cars which are update every years and we can use better car every year and this situation let use to experience the modernest car every year.
The second reason is that, changing always make diffrence which is make hope in peoples life. In fact, people who lives in the past has not hope as much as modern people. To be more specific, now we are always waiting for a change and we want to see the chenges. There is a sycologic fact that, people who are waiting for new things have more hope for living so they are more happy.
In conclusion, I completely believe that modern people who are deal with more chenges are more happy and more satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. becuse people who lives now have not onle exiting life and experience more than the past people, but also they are more hopeful in their life.
- tpo 30 63
- tpo 29 73
- do you agree or disagree businesses should hire employees for their entire lives 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- tpo 31 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...dvent of technology, life style chenge. people are more deal with technology in compar...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... which is helps them to experiens more. However people who lives in the past didnt see ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e. However people who lives in the past didnt see a lot of changes so they were had l...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...l for their life. So modern people have more better life in compare whit the past. For inst...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...r car every year and this situation let use to experience the modernest car every y...
^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'hoped'.
Suggestion: hoped
...t, people who lives in the past has not hope as much as modern people. To be more sp...
^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...I completely believe that modern people who are deal with more chenges are more happy a...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Becuse
...eir lives than people were in the past. becuse people who lives now have not onle exit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49843260188 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.05833690588 2.67179642975 77% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420062695925 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3339393904 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.