The act of young people has always been a very significant matter when it comes to the future of societies. That is owing to the fact that so genious are the young people that they can always have creative ideas and new alternatives about the solution of the problem. There are those who contend that in todays modern era, there is no influence by the young people in order to create better future for their society. I personally repudiate this statement as it seems irrational. In what follows, I will attempt to clarify the reasons of my decision more.
To begin with, The most imperative reason comes to mind at first is that the characteristics that young people have in comparison to the old. At first glance, it is conspicuous that they have more energetic body and more creative mind which help them to have more power to influence their society. Last week when I read a magazine, I faced with a title which stated about the increase the powerfull effect of young on society in comparison to 50 years ago. As I read, this social reaserch has been done about my country and perhaps more research needs to be done in order to confirm exact effect of them.
This reason is generally good but I think it is solely weak to count on.
Another interesting point that deserves some point here is that the population of the young people is too high to can effect on the future of society. As we all know, in the epidemiology science, the researcher always study about the number of parameters. Depend on, I believe that the more kind of people that exist in one country, the more their wants can be reached. In that case, I think due to the number of young people which is the most in my country, they can have great influence in society's future.
To wrap it all up, taking all the aforementioned idea into consideration, I believe that young people depend on different condition can have effect on the future of the society. Not only have they more creative ideas but also they are much enough to have effect on the whole. So, it is highly recommende that assign more work to them in the society to get important decisions.
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 71
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 73
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 83
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... order to confirm exact effect of them. This reason is generally good but I thin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, i think, kind of, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5390625 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48006237102 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471354166667 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9583502275 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.529411765 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192399825548 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664385092957 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413929684037 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108454178248 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499239775657 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.