Actually, I am a big fan of working in a group. Although some people thinks that working alone brings people better performance but I believe that group working has more benefits. University as a small society has more potential to prepare students for future and learn them how to deal with other people. Most of the teachers consider working in a group as a great practice to simulate the future's situation.
First, when students work together, they become a good listener to opposite ideas. Since students in one group have different opinions and ideas, it could be very helpful for them to learn how to deal with each other. Take me as an example, when I was in the university, I worked for one of my projects in a group, one of my friends always had ideas exactly in contrary to mine. At the first, it was very difficult for me to hear her ideas but eventually I learned to be optimistic about her ideas and never become angry.
Moreover, when students work in a group obviously they get better results. Due to the different capacity of students, they can complete each other and cover their weaknesses. Again about my experience, in our group, we divided duties and each of us did some part of our project. Hence, if I did not have enough information about specific part of a project, other members teach me and I think that it was very helpful. In additional, each member finds themselves responsible to other members. Because if one of them do not work well, the whole of group fail.
Finally, imagine a situation that students have a strict deadline for their projects. So working in the group has more speed. By dividing duties students can work parallel and as a result their project goes faster. But if each student wants to work alone, definitely it takes longer.
To sum up, I think that albeit working in the group maybe has some disadvantages but its advantages outweigh drawbacks. Working in a group, especially in the university, could be very beneficial for student and it is a very good practice for their futural duties.
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 60
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 80
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 84
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'futures'' or 'future's'?
Suggestion: futures'; future's
...oup as a great practice to simulate the futures situation. First, when students work...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... outweigh drawbacks. Working in a group, especially in the university, could be v...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'i think', 'in addition', 'as a result', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.187032418953 0.229887763892 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.162094763092 0.158761421928 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0847880299252 0.0866891130778 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0648379052369 0.046263068375 140% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0922693266833 0.0685040099705 135% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.129675810474 0.118717715034 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0224438902743 0.0351676179071 64% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.583416964 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0324189526185 0.0309702414327 105% => OK
Particles: 0.00249376558603 0.00188951952338 132% => OK
Determiners: 0.0798004987531 0.0887237588012 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00997506234414 0.0209618222197 48% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0124688279302 0.0139019557991 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2050.0 2387.08602151 86% => OK
No of words: 360.0 408.028673835 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69444444444 5.86048508987 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48200974243 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.338922669872 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247222222222 0.251872472559 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172222222222 0.174417080927 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0861111111111 0.112833075102 76% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.583416964 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502777777778 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 53.2755303642 59.2087087015 90% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5533526081 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7082704985 48.84282405 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 120.699889404 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.5533526081 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.644075263715 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 42.7222222222 45.7405998639 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.0625 1.45489161554 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18074222267 0.300154397459 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0864965609119 0.103427244359 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0691141257434 0.0752933317313 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.490176359616 0.497263757937 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115503341805 0.151897553556 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756417126882 0.114077575197 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555163843712 0.0781384742642 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.268956248906 0.336927656856 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0389441450218 0.067059652881 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119367977713 0.210909579961 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430514866447 0.0618886996521 70% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.