Learning from doing projects is one of the most important of education. Perfect educations is an investment in one's future. Some people believe doing projects individually has greater results for students that working in group, other would disagree. In my view I agree with statement I think group working for students is much better. In the following paragraphs I will delve in the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
First of all, assigning projects to groups of student is one of the best method to promote teamwork spirit. Teamwork can help foster abilities that are helpful when students get involved in society. For students to achieve a comprehensive, well-rounded education, integrated teamwork on several fronts is vital. The more teamwork fundamentals exhibited, the more opportunity exists for students to learn the vital skills of compromise and collaboration. For example, when I was in high school, we have projects in literature class about ancient poem and its effect on contemporary poets. I and three others of my classmate should do it together. I remember I learned a lot of searching method via internet from my friend which is still helpful. I also touch another member of group how to organize his data. As a result, by working in a group all of us learned new stuffs. Any of these could not be happened if we work individual on our project. It’s clearly shows how working together has more benefits.
Secondly, teamwork-project is fun and make joyful time for students. During education there is not serious responsibilities for students. These Condition let them to also have fun and spend time together during projects. For instance, teenagers are tend to release their energy and put them out. Group project during high school made them to spend time together. They could make jokes, share their interest and doing the stuffs which are less hazardous. On the other hand, if they have free time and nothing to do with school, possibilities of getting involved in dangerous thing increased. This example indicates student’s team working is much better.
To sum up, because of beneficial in team working and joyful time, assigning project to group of students is better. I think teachers should assign more group activities beyond projects.
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing Task 95
- Which one of the following options is a better choice to help you gain confidence when speaking in the classroom the community and the workplace Why Practicing your speech before the presentation Using techniques and methods Learning from others experienc 85
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 82
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... Perfect educations is an investment in ones future. Some people believe doing proje...
^^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... from my friend which is still helpful. I also touch another member of group how ...
^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...g projects. For instance, teenagers are tend to release their energy and put them ou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, first of all, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16489361702 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87222221979 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571808510638 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3717169638 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.6923076923 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4615384615 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96153846154 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318567162861 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823197319234 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592476716034 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198875989659 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468410854899 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.