TPO 37
Being able to manage a lot of work in a short time is an important part of human beings. Humans' eager is the leading part of this matter. Some people believe that learning so many things will prevent individuals to be adept in them, while others disagree. Though no one can ignore the importance of time to be master, I am not in the opinion that doing so many different things makes doing them not carefully; because, it is more probable to make something innovative and also ingenuity plays an important role as well.
People with proper knowledge of different areas have the chance to produce something novel. They can relate the ideas of one aspect to another and combine them to make something innovative. This will incease expanding the knowledge in a specific field. The modern era is the stage of overlapping and you can barely find any boundries anymore. For instance, one of the greatest scientist of contemporary time, is famous for his work on combining physics and art. Two fields that are normally not related that much. The scientist had a taste for art and devised new physical objects in a way they represented as an art figure. The use of formulas and equations in physics help him to produce something that have never been existed before. That is why by doing different things people get familiar with them and can exploit them somewhere else.
Another reason is that people ordinarily think that the more time you put on an issue, the more you do them well. Other than time, there are lots of other things, from abilities to skills to intelligence. Some people can get master in a job readily without much effort whilst others would put their whole time on it and not be able to do as well as them. People are different in many aspects to each other; thus, by not putting enough time in a job, you cannot judge them how well they are. For example, a friend of mine chose two majors to precede in university. Though some people have trouble doing one of them, she graduated first in her class. She had a great ability of managing time and no one can deny her intelligence.
In sum, whether producing new ideas or considering the fact of intelligence, I believe that doing so many different things will not prevent doing them right. That's why we all should expand our activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-04 | zmz | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-04 | vida00 | 76 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | neda77aa | 59 | view |
| 2020-10-16 | Morteza1990 | 60 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | fafoolisalar | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
..., I am not in the opinion that doing so many different things makes doing them not carefully; ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... plays an important role as well. People with proper knowledge of differen...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can exploit them somewhere else. Another reason is that people ordinarily...
^^^^
Line 13, column 102, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...f intelligence, I believe that doing so many different things will not prevent doing them righ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ings will not prevent doing them right. Thats why we all should expand our activities...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65525672372 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4590475943 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520782396088 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5595378335 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5454545455 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.