TPO 38
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
There is no shortage of opinion on whether ability of leading others is made with nurture or nature factors. In my opinion, individuals can be taught to become leader rather than being defined as their birth. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, Some leaders of the previous time are born in the bourgeois or low class family, which means they have not any unique gene or nature behavior related to the leading people. Therefore, they studied how to persuade and control others during lifetime since their nature was analogous to their behavior of parents who had no gene. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been influenced by my own personal experience. When I was thirteen years old, professor made me class leader despite the fact that my forefathers have never been chief. Although it was arduous for me to tell others what they should do, I learned to how I can persuade others to follow my advice thanks to my savvy. Drawing from my own experience, people who were born in substandard family can study how to be leader by gaining knowledge and practicing.
Secondly, In previous time, the princes started governing the region after the demise of former kings because their natural behavior is thought to be excellent as their ancestors. Unfortunately, many kings of ancient nations failed to perform their duty successfully, which led to the beating of the country. By contrast, great nations are established by the individuals who were not sons of king but folks. To be more specific, in the thirteenth century, Genghis khan established the great Mongolia although he was confronting difficulties associated with impoverished life. Though he and his son were great commanders and kings, the empire started losing its power from the time when his grandson started regulating the empire. In conclusion, the king from the notable family failed to govern the nation which was founded by the man who was having inferior life.
I am of the opinion that being leader is not aptitude but ability which can be learnt. This is because people from substandard family leads other successfully while individuals whose forefathers are aristocracy fail to control others.
- TPO 20
- Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs Which option do you prefer Use specific reasons and exam 93
- Some people prefer doing sports on their own such as running while others like to do sports in groups Which one do you prefer 70
- TPO 25 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to use the land for human needs such as farming housing and industry than to save endangered animals Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99734748011 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66948157781 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549071618037 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3032114399 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.823529412 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113559316405 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391702251889 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393548457137 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758736897216 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233766825579 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.