TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People usually inspire by learders who have a great skills in speaking, decision making, and hard woking. Some peole that leadership is a inner talent and can not be tought; others assume otherwise, believing that is just a skill and can be learnt by idividuals. Personally speaking, I support the latter group because of two reasons.
First, leadership is a skill and it can tought be in schools and universities. One of difference of leadership with other skills is that it involves a vast number of other skills. For being a successful leader, you must have a good speaking skill, decision-making skill, and a good skill in assessing situations. So, the leadership needs great efforts, but it is not impossible. When people learn mentioned skills, they can be a good leader. For example, my friend, Hamid, was a shy and quiet in high-school. He could not make right decision about his life, and because of that, he was always lecturing by teachers and his parents. Last year, I saw him talking for a big group of people as their leader in a sale company. Then, I bagan to text him about his leadership, he told me that he gained this skill by attending different classes at university. In sum, leadership is a skill that can be tought.
Second, leadership is a psycological state which people can learn by using psycological lessons. Being confident, tolerant, and observative are the most important features of a leader, and these feature related to unconcious part of people's personalities. A person can create this features by learning some psycological technique. For instance, I had a problem to leading myself to prepar for different exams. On day, I saw clip in Youtube about talking to youselves for increasing confidence and leadership. Then, I every told myself that I could manage myself. In sum, leadership is a unconcious state that can be implied.
In conclusion, I believe that leadership can be learnt because it is a skill and a psycological states.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO51 Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
- TPO 39 Independent task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- sea otters TPO10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'skill'?
Suggestion: skill
...ly inspire by learders who have a great skills in speaking, decision making, and hard ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d woking. Some peole that leadership is a inner talent and can not be tought; oth...
^
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ld manage myself. In sum, leadership is a unconcious state that can be implied. ...
^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is a skill and a psycological states.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90718562874 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96329905851 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523952095808 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3161046859 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0476190476 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9047619048 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139000502036 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486757189734 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359023289481 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869915650517 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214288323699 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.