There is no doubt that the relationship between the student and the teacher is very strong, however, I think that the relation with their friends is stronger. In order to that I disagree with the statement. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanation is going to be as follows.
First of all, I think that the relation between the student and the teacher is limited to the classroom. The teacher can influence the students and increases their creativity and imagination in case of academic subjects, exams, researches and whatever. On the contrary, the relation with their friends is unlimited. They could be able to spend much time together outside the school building and do a lot of activities together.
Furthermore, the new technology and the internet make the student or the youngsters easily contact with each other while they are at home for example, they still keep in touch with them. Besides that, I think that the technology has a role in increasing the distance between the student and the teacher. As the internet able the student to search for information and data, that makes them depend on the technology more than their teachers at the recent days. All that leads to increase the gap between the student and the teacher.
Finally, I think that the age is a significant factor. The people have tendency towards the others of their same age. That is a great evidence of the closely relationship between the friends. For instance, when the students want to have some fun or travelling or playing sports, they call their friends immediately. In addition to that, if they have problem or if they have pleasant event, they also talk with their friends. They can tell friends everything about their personal life and their hobbies. Controversy, the teachers are bigger than the student, so, the student tends to respect them in a restricted frame.
To sum up, due to the aforementioned reasons, I think that the relation between friends is bigger than the relation between the student and his teacher.
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 85
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 66
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 75
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...hip between the student and the teacher is very strong, however, I think that the ...
^^
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...ion between the student and the teacher is limited to the classroom. The teacher c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, no doubt, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92219020173 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63899854089 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481268011527 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5755637364 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116348476102 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419170478274 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414389229116 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731891394471 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174216535417 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.