There is no shortage of debate about whether teachers were more important for societies or their significance decreased. In my opinion, they saved their importance but I guess a few decades ago, they were more effective on people. This is obviously a fundamental indicater that demonstrates significance. Although vast majority believes teachers saved their importance, it is obvious that they lost the image for society, because learning was a bigger need in the past and being a teacher is much more easy nowadays.
To begin with, a half century ago there were not enough learning source which people can Access easily. In that years, if you want to be a well educated person or just want to learn something new, you have to go school. One another way was taking courses at home from a teacher. As it is obvious, the only source of information was teachers. Think about there was not internet and it was difficult to reach education without someone who can teach you. Are not teachers the most important individuals in societies for this scenario? The obvious conclusion to be drawn is teachers importance was undeniable by someone.
Moreover, getting an education to be a teacher is much more easy. Of course it is the natural censequence of the quantity of universities and education faculties. As a result of supply – demand balance, if you reach that level of education easily, quality decreases. Nowadays teachers are not well educated, therefore they are not capable enough to teach as it was as in the past. Make sure, everyone knows lots of inadequate teacher. This is because teachers are too many due to the fact that it is not difficult to be a teacher. As a result of these reasons above, society does not consider that teachers are valuable anymore.
To sum up, the obvious conclusion to be drawn is teachers are not qualified anymore. That is why, even little children do not want to be teacher in their future. Is not it enough to prove their significance in the past? I remember my many friends wanted to be teacher when we are all children. Although teaching is still very important ability, nowadays teachers can not meet that requirement as it was as in the past.
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some young adults want to be independent as soon as possible. While others prefer to live with family member as long as they can. 66
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, i guess, of course, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 15.1003584229 265% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83023872679 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71349025439 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509283819629 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6875568146 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1739130435 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3913043478 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169946867008 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052398448619 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343914340255 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114202887579 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032082613179 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.