TPO 42
It goes without saying that the satisfaction of employees depends on different factors. So many approaches have been propounded in this regard. Personally, I believe that doing similar tasks during the workday will more satisfy laborers. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, by doing one task all day along, workers can concentrate more on their duties. If workers properly focus on their duties, they will make more progress in their work. The workers are more satisfied in according to their sufficient progress. Moreover, they can find a better position in the company, and they will have more salary if they develop at tremendous speed, which can cause workers to be satisfied. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About ten years ago, I had been doing different tasks all day long; therefore, I had been making various faults in mu work due to the lack of concentration. After two years, my boss wanted me to do similar jobs in one day. Fortunately, I made fewer errors, so my boss or I was satisfied.
Second, doing various tasks in one day makes laborers more tired, and their efficiency will decline. In other words, workers must be energetic and efficient enough to help their company develops exceedingly. Hence, when the company makes adequate progress, the boss will be satisfied with his employees. The satisfaction of the boss is a crucial factor in the fulfillment of his workers. For instance, since twenty years ago, my father has been working in a structural engineering company. He says to me during these years; he always was the most energetic person in the company because he was the only person who had just similar works all along a day. Therefore, he has done his duties correctly since he was hired, so it satisfied him all these years.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that laborers are more satisfied when they have similar tasks all day long. This is because they can concentrate properly on their duties, and they are more relax and efficient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-15 | TOEFLpreparation | 60 | view |
| 2020-10-21 | neda77aa | 3 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | ericandlf2 | 70 | view |
| 2020-07-29 | amininilooffar | 83 | view |
| 2020-06-06 | Nomun | 65 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples t 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...y. He says to me during these years; he always was the most energetic person in the compan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85511363636 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64560335951 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517045454545 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8399422959 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.380952381 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7619047619 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.