Jobs has become one prominent issue in the society nowadays which has engendered many controversies among people. One privilege question which has raised in this regard is that whether workers are more satisfied when they have different types of tasks than when they do similar tasks. While some people believe that doing similar tasks is not only easier but also more satisfying, others hold the opposite perspective. I firmly think that doing different types of tasks is better because of some noticeable reason. The ensuing paragraphs will elaborate on my points of view.
The most considerable reason is that doing different task help us develop our skill which is a satisfying factor for humans. Most people enjoy learning new staffs and skills which improve their resume as well as making them feel more satisfied by themselves. For instance, last year, I started a job in a renown company as a documentation expert which contained a lot of different tasks during the day. Although it was difficult in the beginning, it really helped me learn a lot of novel skills which make me feel better about my abilities. It indicates that doing this kind of job makes employees more satisfied.
Another significant reason which worths some words here is that doing a similar task for a prolonged time would result in depression. All human needs variety in some aspect of life for feeling more excited. Lack of variation can be a reason for being exhausted most day, as a result, it can cause depression. A recent survey on this topic has been done recently. In this survey, a lot of employee from different companies were examined to find whether there is a relation between kind of job people do and their mental diseases. It turns out that people who have a monotonous job and do the same task every day suffer from depression more than who do different types of tasks. It implies that doing different tasks results is more desirable.
To sum up, after all the factors being into consideration, we might come to the result that the advantages of doing different tasks surpass its disadvantages. I recommend that people should try to have a job with different daily tasks which can satisfy them more.
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 70
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 3
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 80
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 60
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun employee seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of employees'.
Suggestion: a lot of employees
...has been done recently. In this survey, a lot of employee from different companies were examined ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ry day suffer from depression more than who do different types of tasks. It implies...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, well, while, after all, for instance, kind of, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86933333333 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60815814108 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554666666667 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0662671103 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1052631579 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380143116284 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124489738228 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111680528155 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248802190747 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859519747368 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.