When it comes to correcting other people's mistakes, people in general only correct them within their minds instead of telling their ideas to them. Relatively few people correct them immediately by interrupting. As for me, the best and appropriate way is to wait until they are available to listen to my opinions.
Clearly, it is rude to interrupt while people are delivering a speech, or during a meeting.
Certainly, audience may harbor considerable questions in the mind during meetings or classes. Although teachers are always willing to discuss with their students, it is still not polite to disrupt their teaching during class. The discussion timing is crucial. As a result, a feasible approach is to discuss in the Q&A sections, or after the class. My English professor is a great example. She was a new professor in our department, which means she had quite few teaching experience. My classmate, Judy, is a hardworking student who always preview before attending every class, and she always ask a bunch of questions during every class. Professor's teaching schedule delayed due to those questions, and it does have harmful impacts to other students. Professor taught much less compared to her other class.
Moreover, it is proper to prepare before asking a question. Whenever I conceive a question related to class or meeting which I attend to, I always write down those questions. Then after the class or meeting, I re-think my question and do some research for related materials in order to figure out possible explanations on my own, or to verify my doubts. This is meaningful to me before asking the teacher or the meeting leader since there is a great chance that I misunderstand their meaning, or I had incorrect or insufficient knowledge. After all, teachers and meeting leaders are much more familiar with the topic they are discussed. Thus, I will organize my doubts and acquire background knowledge before discussion for improving the quality of discussion.
Accordingly, I prefer to waiting until the class or meeting is over and the teacher or meeting leader is finally had free for discussing about their controversial opinions.
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 62
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 86
- People today are too individualistic. Instead of pursuing self-centered, separate goals, people need to understand that satisfaction comes from working for the greater good of the family, the Community or society as a whole. 50
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 86
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asks'.
Suggestion: asks
...e attending every class, and she always ask a bunch of questions during every class...
^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wait'?
Suggestion: wait
...f discussion. Accordingly, I prefer to waiting until the class or meeting is over and ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'finally', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'thus', 'while', 'after all', 'as for', 'as to', 'in general', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212121212121 0.229887763892 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.158761421928 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0782828282828 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0505050505051 0.046263068375 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0959595959596 0.0685040099705 140% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0959595959596 0.118717715034 81% => OK
Participles: 0.040404040404 0.0351676179071 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84487255284 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0479797979798 0.0309702414327 155% => OK
Particles: 0.00505050505051 0.00188951952338 267% => OK
Determiners: 0.0757575757576 0.0887237588012 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00505050505051 0.0209618222197 24% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0126262626263 0.0139019557991 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2149.0 2387.08602151 90% => OK
No of words: 353.0 408.028673835 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08781869688 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48200974243 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.416430594901 0.338922669872 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311614730878 0.251872472559 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215297450425 0.174417080927 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13597733711 0.112833075102 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84487255284 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563739376771 0.524397521467 108% => OK
Word variations: 62.9324264773 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.65 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4854860844 48.84282405 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.45 120.699889404 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.644075263715 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 48.8114730878 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.11290322581 1.45489161554 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394350574796 0.300154397459 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.091818378337 0.103427244359 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0606603974993 0.0752933317313 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.472822185172 0.497263757937 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.216683786173 0.151897553556 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136257974749 0.114077575197 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105969806696 0.0781384742642 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.288267906808 0.336927656856 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10209944491 0.067059652881 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250499414334 0.210909579961 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889047965197 0.0618886996521 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8870967742 50% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 8.42114695341 24% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.