Trying to reach out or expressing yourself in a classroom or a meeting is a great method to influence people there which can lead you to better opportunities in the future. However, sometimes the person who is in charge of the meeting or classroom might say something wrong in front of all people there to you. Germane to this fact, a question which is matter of debate, a controversial one, is how you should react to this event. Although it may not be accepted by all, I am, personally, on the conviction that you better wait until the classroom or the meeting ends and then talk with that person while other audience are gone.
One compelling reason deserving to be mentioned is that when you wait to talk about someone's mistake privately, you seem more polite and educated. Psychologically speaking, people do not like to be corrected in front of others and consider this act as an insult. Consequently, when you avoid correcting other people, especially a teacher or a leader of meeting, and instead wait until the end of the session, they will have a positive opinion about you. Furthermore, they might even appreciate you for this and for showing them where they had a mistake, because they will not repeat this mistake in group of people again.
Another reason substantiating my stance which is equally important, if not more, is that when you correct people after privately, it can save you from the powerful people hurting you. Generally speaking, the people who lead an office or an organization does not like their authority to be questioned. To delineate, opposing a teacher or a leader of a meeting can actually have a bad effect in mind of the people presents there. Therefore, the person in charge not only will criticize you for no apparent reason, but also they might fire you or give you less marks in the case of the teachers. As a result, if you wait to correct them after the meeting will not challenge their power and they will not act like this. A vivid example can shed more light on the issue. When I was in highschool, I corrected my math teacher right in front of other students in the class. Although he accept that I was right, but afterward he never treated me well and he gave me a very low score in the final exam, even though i knew i could gave got a better grade easily.
To recapitulate, it is harmful to point out other person's mistakes right away, especially when they have power of hurting you and the based on the reasons and personal experiences stated above, you can get the best behavior of the teachers or leaders when you tell they are wrong in private. Although it might not be agreed by all, I ,strongly, recommend those ones who read this passage to correct other people in charge or their superiors when they are alone with each other, not in public.
- Parents do not understand their children as well as they understood their children 50 years ago 77
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 86
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun marks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ut also they might fire you or give you less marks in the case of the teachers. As a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 880, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'accepts'.
Suggestion: accepts
...ther students in the class. Although he accept that I was right, but afterward he neve...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1007, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ow score in the final exam, even though i knew i could gave got a better grade ea...
^
Line 5, column 1014, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e in the final exam, even though i knew i could gave got a better grade easily. ...
^
Line 5, column 1022, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
... final exam, even though i knew i could gave got a better grade easily. To recapi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lthough it might not be agreed by all, I ,strongly, recommend those ones who read ...
^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...e agreed by all, I ,strongly, recommend those ones who read this passage to correct other ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'consequently', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.170289855072 0.229887763892 74% => OK
Verbs: 0.161231884058 0.158761421928 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0597826086957 0.0866891130778 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0797101449275 0.046263068375 172% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0905797101449 0.0685040099705 132% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.11231884058 0.118717715034 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0380434782609 0.0351676179071 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57875734459 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0271739130435 0.0309702414327 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0036231884058 0.00188951952338 192% => OK
Determiners: 0.103260869565 0.0887237588012 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0307971014493 0.0209618222197 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0271739130435 0.0139019557991 195% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2808.0 2387.08602151 118% => OK
No of words: 501.0 408.028673835 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60479041916 5.86048508987 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.303393213573 0.338922669872 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.215568862275 0.251872472559 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.141716566866 0.174417080927 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0918163672655 0.112833075102 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57875734459 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477045908184 0.524397521467 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.2645655203 59.2087087015 93% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.8333333333 20.5533526081 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0916629666 48.84282405 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 120.699889404 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.5533526081 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.644075263715 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.54480286738 126% => OK
Readability: 49.3902195609 45.7405998639 108% => OK
Elegance: 0.967213114754 1.45489161554 66% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490467494857 0.300154397459 163% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101684906426 0.103427244359 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0716462064668 0.0752933317313 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502329524343 0.497263757937 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133673024933 0.151897553556 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202210103248 0.114077575197 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10659237376 0.0781384742642 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.44173997661 0.336927656856 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.051944891921 0.067059652881 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364569399438 0.210909579961 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782625472076 0.0618886996521 126% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8870967742 50% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.86379928315 259% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 2.4623655914 366% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.