Since the dawn of civilization, people have been concerned about dedicating time to the ones that they love, for example, their children. By the advent of technology, dedicating much of their time to their job have become an inevitable issue for people but they are still concerned about spending time with their families. In this regard, there is a controversial debate amongst people that it is for busy parents who do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of their time is to have fun together, others believe it is better to dedicate that time to do schoolwork together. Personally speaking, I am in favor of the first approach. I assert my viewpoint for two reasons and will illustrate them in the following.
The first aspect to be mentioned is the importance of rebounding between children and their busy parents. To be more specific, the best way that a parent can rebind with his child is to entertain her for example, playing computer games, drawing painting, or playing sports together. Especially the action that the child enjoys the most. on the other hand, rebounding is harder to form between parents and children through doing schoolwork owing to the fact that the child feels a lot of pressure during doing homework and it does not really help the relationship between parents and children. To put this in a more vivid picture, let me take myself as an example, when I was in primary school, I seldom saw my parents because they were very busy with their trades. Whenever they were home, they tried to help me with my school work but it was not pleasing to me. Although they were trying to get closer to me, I refused to spend time with them because it made me nervous due to the fact that I was assumed that spending time with my parents is equal to doing homework not having fun.
Apart from the point discussed above, let asset this opinion from the children's perspective. Parents are responsible for their children, they should make their children's life thrilled and make them feel safe when they are together. The best way to do that is to ask the children what they are willing to do when they are spending that little time with their parents. In other words, the time that parents are free is the children's right; hence, it is more moral to ask the children what they want to do with that spare time. Obviously, most of the children prefer to spend that time playing with their parents not to do boring homework. To convey my notion, take a research amongst primary school children as a convincing reason. When one asked a group of students about their idea toward their preferences between spending time with parents to do home works or to have fun, they all opted for the second choice which was dedicating the time to entertainments.
All in all, according to the aforementioned points and examples, I cling to the idea that it is better for the parents to dedicate their extra time to play with their children. However, there is an opposing view that it is better to spend that time working on schoolwork together but from the standpoint of being fair to children and put their needs first, I am willing to conclude that spending the free time on having fun together is indispensable for families in order to rebound and be fair to their children.
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 60
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 68
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 80
- TOEFL T P O 31 Integrated Writing Task 85
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... action that the child enjoys the most. on the other hand, rebounding is harder to...
^^
Line 2, column 839, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d to help me with my school work but it was not pleasing to me. Although they were trying to get...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ing homework. To convey my notion, take a research amongst primary school children as a co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, really, second, so, still, apart from, for example, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 82.0 43.0788530466 190% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 95.0 52.1666666667 182% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2721.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 586.0 407.700716846 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6433447099 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49645405435 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412969283276 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1486542842 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.571428571 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9047619048 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441925473975 0.236089414692 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149707048175 0.076458572812 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134371433337 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308996749334 0.150856017488 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085490972257 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.