tpo 49
Having friends who can have a delightful time with is the center of a healthy life for mankind. Depend on a person, people usually choose as much as friends that they think they need. Albeit many people assert quality of relationships is way more important than quantities of them, I believe the quantity has more advantages.
Firstly, Imagine a person has few friends, so if those friends of him were so busy to spend time with that person, he had to spend his leisure time lonely. On the other hand, if the person has a lot of friends, the probability of time in which he has to spend in solitude will dramatically reduce due to the numerous friends that he has. Since it is a rare condition that too many people's free time becomes crowded at the same time. for example, when I was at my undergraduate program in university, I had many friends; therefore, it was really uncommon that I spent my time alone, hence there was always a person whom I could do some staffs with.
Moreover, having more friends means more people with different skills. In that case, a person is able to learn from those experiences and knowledge for free. The classes in which a person can learn new skills are expensive yet, everyone needs to take participate in those classes due to the requirements that a person has to fulfill in order to get a job. For example, on the days mentioned before, I learned STATA, an application that is essentially needed for economic tasks. The classes of STATA were so expensive at that time and if I had not met that person, I could not use the application right now, because I could not afford the class fees on those days.
In conclusion, having a lot of friends is neither a waste of time nor a bad idea. Having vast numbers of friends not only makes your leisure times more pleasant but it can also teach you many things for free. So, as far as I am concerned, people should have as much as friends that they can handle with
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | mmorteza | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | firataydogdu | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | TOEFLpreparation | 70 | view |
| 2020-09-18 | Hamide | 70 | view |
- Some people that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. 83
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 60
- tpo 49 3
- tpo 48 3
- What recent news story has affected you the most In what ways has it affected you 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ue to the numerous friends that he has. Since it is a rare condition that too many pe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... time becomes crowded at the same time. for example, when I was at my undergraduate...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48595505618 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49729527973 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51404494382 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9358973643 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.