It is vivid that friends full a noticeable huge part of our lives and every individual at least holds one particular relationship that represents them with a tangible fulfillment. But the scheme of having one strong friendship or trying to make other new ones instead of amplifying the existing have always been a controversy. Personally I support the latter one for following reasons:
To begin with the secure feeling from the friends who have been with you for life time is priceless. Feeling that there are people who always can be trusted to be with you and take your side even in life and death decisions something that not every one has been gifted with. In addition trust for the newly met friends is something that an individual can't expect to be payed back and honored.
The other proof that can be named for the argument is that the shoulder people frequently look for through tough moments are the familiar ones not the stranger's! You can always easily whack up your pains, obstacles and feelings with some one who know your personality, intentions and thoughts and ask for help but I fear to say that the backup and feedback you desire from one that you'd barely met isn't always as we expect and wish to be.
At last the real care and love is something that brings the commenters of this debate to second thoughts. it is most obvious that the ones whom have passed their friendship tests are the ones who get to be presented with the love and the care they deserve the most. This is some thing that can be achieved only by time and nothing else. Say thinking of a colleague that is new to your working department and some friend from high-school which is the one who might tackle up some favor inside you? The confident response is the vibe from high-school.
To wrap up it is true that meeting new people may supply you with the opportunities and lucks that you could have never imagined of but consequently it is the old friends that you celebrate this chance with! Extrapolating from the mentioned the conclusion is that strengthening the friendships is more beneficial in lots of features.
- Modern technology is creating a single world culture. Do you agree or disagree and give reasons and examples 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or co-workers - than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. Use specific reasons and examples 73
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 60
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m the friends who have been with you for life time is priceless. Feeling that the...
^^
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...the friends who have been with you for life time is priceless. Feeling that there are p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime is priceless. Feeling that there are people who always can be trusted to be w...
^^
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... not every one has been gifted with. In addition trust for the newly met friends is some...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...friends is something that an individual cant expect to be payed back and honored. T...
^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...your pains, obstacles and feelings with some one who know your personality, intentions a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you'd
...p and feedback you desire from one that youd barely met isnt always as we expect and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ou desire from one that youd barely met isnt always as we expect and wish to be. At...
^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ters of this debate to second thoughts. it is most obvious that the ones whom have...
^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...the care they deserve the most. This is some thing that can be achieved only by time and n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, may, second, so, then, at least, in addition, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65683646113 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.541037379 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520107238606 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.128493005 48.9658058833 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.75 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0833333333 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18356513432 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721520567108 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604234061816 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118033391561 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474596559294 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.