TPO 50
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
It is critically important that universities consider various factors when they design a curriculum since it will play a significant role in the development of students in the university. Personally, I believe that universities should not force students to enroll in irrelevant courses to their major like history courses for students who their field of study is not history. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students’ academic performance will be affected by attending compulsory classes like history classes. To be more specific, students are really swamped with their major projects and assignments. Therefore, they do not have extra time to devote to courses that are not related to their field of study. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a master’s student in math, the university made me take a literature course beside my major courses. It was a tough time, I had to work on my thesis and took part in that class. I did not have enough time to focus completely on my thesis due to I could not submit it due time and I asked for an extended time. Consequently, it took an extra semester to graduate from university.
Secondly, unrelated courses to the students’ majors like history will put extra money for students and their parents as that money would be reflected in tuition fees. In other words, the university has to hire professors to teach those courses. As a result, students cannot meet their major’s requirements and buy things that are necessary for their major, because they have to pay for their fees. For instance, one of my friends who was a computer science could not purchase a laptop in the first year of university, for she had to cover tuition that was due to take irrelevant mandatory courses such as art, history, and so on.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that students do not need to take courses that are not related to their major. This is due to the fact that it would affect students both academically and financially
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 80
- TPO 50 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 71
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 60
- TPO 40 independent Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81408450704 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78311284709 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3276017761 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.529411765 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41176470588 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254118391839 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848673553289 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078282228992 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169432169558 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293778672399 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81408450704 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78311284709 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3276017761 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.529411765 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41176470588 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254118391839 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848673553289 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078282228992 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169432169558 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293778672399 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.