nal experiences is a compelling illustration of this. A recent policy in my city announced that all street dustbins would be removed, and citizens have to bring their trash home. I was furious at this policy since most of my time was spent outside the home, resulting in considerable inconvenience. However, I ignored that the financial saving from the sanitary department was planned to offer the subsidy to low-income families, and it was widely supported by the people who do not have decent jobs. The policy partially sacrificed the convince but promoted the quality of life for thousands of people, and groups that stood on the opposite stance changed their altitude after they realised how beneficial this policy could be and turned to support its implementation.
Furthermore, taking the ideas from other sides of view will calm us down from being overly extreme. People who reject different standpoints are more likely to become extreme under the constant effect of an unchangeable opinion environment. I understand that many people do not will to pay their patience and time to the news that contradicts their minds, but those points, to some extent, can pull us back from going too far. Take an instance from history. Imperial Japan developed an exclusive opinion environment during World War II, and all newspapers were unbelievably promoting the braveness of soldiers, justifying the war, and even praising the massacres they committed. However, the people who doubted the fight were arrested, executed, and assassinated. People could not hear rational voices and quickly fall into zealousness, believed it was glorious to die for the emperor. This excessiveness bond the entire nation with a statement of hostility to the world and pushed this country into a greater disaster.
In conclusion, I believe that it is beneficial to receive points of view from various sides. This is because receiving information from other aspects forms people comprehensive understandings of incidents, also prevents us from sliding into irrational thinking by helping us reconsider our stances.
- tpo 66 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 100
- TPO 63 73
- tpo 61 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading 71
- TPO 52 integrated writing task 81
- TPO 64 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nal
nal experiences is a compelling illustratio...
^^^
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t jobs. The policy partially sacrificed the convince but promoted the quality of life for th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 905, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'bonds'.
Suggestion: bonds
...die for the emperor. This excessiveness bond the entire nation with a statement of h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31325301205 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91663331448 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5633017812 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100690603446 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335426767608 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303026633029 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674400811805 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380585572353 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.