tpo17
In recent years, advertising has always been one of the effective central factors in society. Controversy exists over weather advertisements show products much better than reality. In this regard, I am in complete agreement that nowadays, most advertisements try to introduce products much better than they really are. In what follows, I will pinpoint main reasons for my assertion.
The first aspect to point out is that, competition has intensified in market. Nowadays, since technology has been developed dramatically, many companies are come into market with different features for their products. So, obviously there is competition among them in order to take more portion of market. Take the case of two companies which produce luxury pens. Each of them tries to present its product with conspicuous features like it's equipped with modern tiny parts which allows you erase its effect with your breathe! This is not a real performance of this vehicle but it seems that it's exaggerated by advertising.
A further subtle point is that, more people are attracted to buy goods. Many ways can be taken into account in order to convincing costumers to buy a special thing. For instance, the company can give the products with more discounts or using advertisement by focusing on bolding of boons, even much than they really are. Consider an engineering student who confronts an advertisement about high-technology software for drafting. He paid a lot of money for this software, since it has fantastic applications. However, according to advertisement this specific software can draw different geometries of bodies with elaborated curves, in real work conditions it fails to do the mentioned task with demand accuracy.
The last but not the least, selling more products is the result of more interactive advertisement. This strategy can be useful for company owners to gain more income. As a result, they pay more to people involved with advertisement tasks. So, they assume it as a potential opportunity to attain more achievements by presentation of products over the reality. As an example food industry sometimes pay some percentages of selling as a main part of advertisement. So, it leads advertisements to come into market with extraordinary claims, like this soup is what you can eat and be faster in running.
By taking into account all the aforementioned reasons, based on severe extant competition and since advertisement can attract more people towards special products and this process has benefits for advertisements companies, it seems that they are eager to present the hallmarks of products much better than they are. As a suggestion, people should try to investigate the advertisement with more accuracy to have desirable selection during their commercial activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | SeehtEntity | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | paras2 | 71 | view |
| 2018-11-09 | Saharmgh | 90 | view |
| 2017-05-29 | hd1366 | 3 | view |
| 2015-06-23 | negin papen | 90 | view |
- It is more important for students to do the reading by themselves based on their own interest than to read what to their teachers assign 90
- tpo17 3
- Should high school students be required to study many different subjects at the same time or they should study only three or four subjects at the time 78
- TPO 33 71
- Students of a university have a long break between university semesters; the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break:۱٫ Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: BREATHE_BREATH[4]
Message: Did you mean 'breath'? 'Breathe' is a verb.
Suggestion: breath
...h allows you erase its effect with your breathe! This is not a real performance of this...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33257918552 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07351504767 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536199095023 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5674683101 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.47826087 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2173913043 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.69565217391 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.