Traditional and alternative sources of energy: what is better ?
The importance of searching for sources of energy has always been major, because people have begun to use more technical things and scientists create more devices, that all needs more electricity. There are some types of energy sources: traditional and alternative (renewable). But some people think, that traditional sources of energy, such as coal, petroleum and nature gas, will be enough to satisfy needs of people, for example transport, industry, science, etc. In my opinion, traditional sources of energy cannot satisfy our needs of people, because they are not renewable.
There are some people, who believe, that traditional sources of energy are major ones and they will be enough to satisfy human needs. Really, in the 19th century people used the source of energy, such as coal. Then, people started to use petroleum. Now, people are using wind, solar, nuclear and biogas energies. Wind, solar, and biogas energies are called renewable sources of energy. I think, that people need to use these sources of energy, because they are renewable and environmentally friendly.
Now I will prove, that alternative sources of energy are better than traditional ones. Firstly, traditional sources of energy are not environmentally friendly. Petroleum outflows pollute oceans. Radioactive wastes pollute the soil. Traditional sources of energy trigger ecological problems. Secondly, traditional sources of energy are exhaustible. More and more scientists say, that traditional sources of energy will be exhausted in 40 years. I read this opinion in scientific magazines. Alternative sources of energy are renewable. We can use energy of wind, solar energy and biogas energy for a very long time. Now alternative energy is developing in many countries. The cars on alternative kinds of fuel are created thanks to developing alternative energy.
There are two opinions about traditional and alternative sources of energy. Some people consider, that traditional sources of energy are better than alternative ones. Other people think, that alternative sources of energy are better than traditional ones. I have proved, that alternative sources are better, because they are renewable and environmentally friendly, and trigger the development of new industries.
- There are many different styles of classes at schools nowadays. Some students prefer classes where they interact with their teachers and with other students in debates and group assignments. Others prefer classes where they just listen to their teacher sp 70
- Traditional and alternative sources of energy: what is better ? 60
- A live in small town and a big city benefits and problems and what is better 61
- Many people believe that it is very important to make large amounts of money, while others are satisfied to earn a comfortable living. Analyze each viewpoint and take a stand. Give specific reasons for your positions. 61
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to pretect the environment is better, but some people say the traditional energy source such as coal and oil is less expensice, what is your suggestion. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore electricity. There are some types of energy sources: traditional and alternat...
^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e renewable. But some people think, that traditional sources of energy, such as ...
^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...But some people think, that traditional sources of energy, such as coal, petrole...
^^
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gas, will be enough to satisfy needs of people, for example transport, industry,...
^^
Line 1, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, traditional sources of energy cannot satisfy our needs of people, because th...
^^
Line 1, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of energy cannot satisfy our needs of people, because they are not renewable. ...
^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me people, who believe, that traditional sources of energy are major ones and the...
^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not environmentally friendly. Petroleum outflows pollute oceans. Radioactive was...
^^
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ible. More and more scientists say, that traditional sources of energy will be ex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, for example, i think, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61627906977 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88200905678 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427325581395 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3960092182 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3076923077 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2307692308 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03846153846 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40523282618 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159735966972 0.076458572812 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124460698099 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312184324089 0.150856017488 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133917811468 0.0645574589148 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.