Traveling alone is better or with a group and guide
By and large, it is beyond doubt that Earth is full of adventures and wonders. In this regard, traveling for exposure to these areas is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars whether traveling alone is fun or taking a group tour with a guide is better. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of traveling by myself. To what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first reason corroborating my opinion is the fact that going on a trip alone without a guide prevents you from the restriction because traveling with unknown people, bounds a person with so many things, of not his interest. It is worth mentioning that nowadays people live their life how they want. So, when it comes to enjoying a vacation, they would definitely not like to travel with a group because when you travel with a group, the schedule of the trip is planned and every group member has to follow the time management. In addition, if people take a guide, they have to follow him whatever he suggests. Ultimately people get absurd and bored. Vividly, if they want to take the maximum out of their vacations, they would prefer to travel without any restrictions. By a way of illustration, last year I went on a group tour to Istanbul for 2 days on my transit flight to America. The tour was already planned by the company and everybody has to be on time on the bus in order to pursue their trip. What happened was very terrific that I got stuck in my luggage area and I missed the bus. Then I took a cab to reach the first stop of the bus and joined the crew. I did not like the way they were showing us the famous places of Istanbul because they did not give us enough time to properly enjoy visiting places. It wasted my 2 days and on top of that my money. If I had visited Istanbul in a cab by myself, it would have been a very different and cherishable experience. This example clearly shows that traveling alone is better.
The second rationale behind my viewpoint is rooted in the fact that with the advent of technology we do not need a group and a guide to visit different places. Today in this contemporary lifestyle, people have mobile phones and internet facilities throughout the world. They can search maps, famous places, food, and whatever they desire through the internet. It is notable that documentaries about different places are also available on the Internet. Thus, we don't really need to hire a guide to get directions and tell stories. A case in mind is a profound example of this. 5 years ago, I went to Swat with my family. We were visiting that place the first time so we did not know their culture and traditions. Thanks to modern technology, I had internet access and searched everything about Swat's culture. It helped us to have a memorable trip without a group and a guide.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although exploring the world is helpful with a group but going on a solo trip is much exciting. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating: first, traveling alone prevents people from restrictions, secondly, technology has taken place of a guide today. So, I vehemently urge tourists to travel by themselves. By doing so, they will take full advantage of a trip.
- Pluto as a planet 68
- benefits of going green 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet The pa 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...tour with a guide is better. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of tra...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lso available on the Internet. Thus, we dont really need to hire a guide to get dire...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as for, as to, in addition, by and large, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2727.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 596.0 407.700716846 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5755033557 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94096258147 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6161516959 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48322147651 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 862.2 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9394624097 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6363636364 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0606060606 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33999992195 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721220778719 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112943547355 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230797405124 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760946995329 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.