In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use then they are today.
Invention of car was one of the major events in the twentieth century; it has made the movement of people much easier. Although the use of car is omnipresent today, the scenario would change within twenty years as the use of them will be reduced.
To begin with, the use of internet is eliminating the need of movement of people as they do their jobs and study online, and hence with time there will be no need of people to go office for jobs and attend classrooms for receiving education. Consequently, the use of cars will become limited. For example, the spread of Corona virus has forced people to stay at home: they are doing their official works by using internet and students are following their teachers on online platforms. If this is possible to perform the responsibilities while at home now, then why would people take the burden to move from one place to another, which requires them to spend money and energy? As people will not need to move from their houses, there will no use of cars at all, and they would become rare in those streets where they now are abundant. The improvement of science and technology will enable people to maintain the society while staying at home and will reduce the use of cars in the streets thereby.
Moreover, in response to the environmental pollution problem, governments are now planning to shrink the use of fuel, and this plans includes supplanting personal cars by public transports, which is much more environment friendly. Use of fossil fuel has increased with the development of transportation; those burnt fuels destroy the environment as they do harm to the ozone layer. To reduce the destruction of the environment, scientists are constantly searching for energy efficient alternatives, but those solutions are not coming so easily. As a result, governments are trying to follow some other strategies which include the increased use of public transport in place of individual cars. They are constructing metro rails, introducing new buses which are alternatives to hundreds of private cars in roads. With an increase in those public transports, the private cars would become scarce in the roads in the near future.
In conclusion, the use of private car is going to be reduced, although would not become extinct, in the near future. The improvement in internet technology and attempt of the governments of the countries to solve the environmental problem caused by using personal cars are going to hasten the removal of cars from road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus the Sun s 73
- dddd 3
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 29
- dsdsd 3
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no 46
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, then, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93586698337 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77334199095 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482185273159 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2688041286 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3125 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346886933177 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121466821032 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105645230134 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219312649949 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857690364768 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.