Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future
In order to ensure that no problem will occur in the future, any government must have a broader outlook and should try to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Problem arises when something does not go right. In a country immediate problems arises for the narrow outlook of the past government. Without anticipating the future problem and try to solve them, no government can rightly be called successful. For example, Dhaka City of Bangladesh is in the top ranking in terms of traffic jam: a situation which is killing precious times of the city people. However, this problem could be omitted if the government who previously ruled were not myopic and were not busy with their running problems in hand. The condition of the city was far better than today even before two or three decades ago. The rapid growth of population and economy of Bangladesh has turned Dhaka city into a densely populated and a busy one and as a result the city is suffering from traffic jam problem since number of roads has not increased parallely to the people. The previous governments could not anticipate this problem though there were many indication of this upcoming problem: economy of Bangladesh is based on capital based and hence it is easy to anticipate that in near future a explosion of people could occur.
However, considering this running problem if the present government keeps itself busy with the immediate problems it may happen that the problem of traffic jam is solved for only a time being and could hurt the city with more intensity in near future. So, in order to solve the immediate problem the government must anticipate the trend of the problem and which additional problem may arise in order to eradicate the problem completely.
Unemployment is a common problem for each and every government of the countries of the world. But though it is an immediate problem solution of it must be done considering the future problems. For example, in order to solve the present unemployment problem government may construct factories and create many job sector there. However, if the government fails to anticipate the environmental impact of the factories then there is strong possibility that many more problems along with unemployment is going to hurt the future generations.
In order to solve the current electricity problem government of Bangladesh installed some rental basis power plant in which main fuel was oil. Though it temporarily solved the electricity problem, now it is hurting people for the fact that the price of electricity has risen and has already gone beyond the pay limit of the people. Had the government anticipated the problem and took measures accordingly the present sufferings of the people would not take place.
However, there are some problems which must be solved in order to keep people happy about the performance of the government but it is the moral duty of the government to anticipate the future problems and take measures today. Otherwise, people may appreciate them today for their performance but in the near future those same people are going to criticize them for their parochial outlook.
Government must anticipate the future problems and should try to solve them in order to make sure that current sufferings of people do not last long.
- dsdsd 3
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 50
- Some people believe that citizens can most benefit their communities by contributing timeand resources to volunteer efforts (e.g., town cleanups, youth sports leagues, food andclothing drives). Others believe that a community is better served when most of 50
- In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through the major downtown areas, a part of the town where buses serve as the only form o 49
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest f 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...es not go right. In a country immediate problems arises for the narrow outlook of the pa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 882, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... not increased parallely to the people. The previous governments could not anticipa...
^^^
Line 3, column 959, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun indication seems to be countable; consider using: 'many indications'.
Suggestion: many indications
...ticipate this problem though there were many indication of this upcoming problem: economy of Ba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1104, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... easy to anticipate that in near future a explosion of people could occur. Howe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2753.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.014571949 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68159002211 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415300546448 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 877.5 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3165613817 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.095238095 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499905017449 0.243740707755 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182525681762 0.0831039109588 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110254186959 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308746372481 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493949769087 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.