Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The question of whether governments should prioritize solving the immediate problems of today over trying to anticipate and address future challenges is a topic that has sparked much debate. While it is crucial to consider and prepare for the future, I contend that governments must first and foremost address the pressing issues of the present, as they directly impact the well-being and stability of society.
First and foremost, addressing immediate problems is a matter of urgency and necessity. Neglecting present issues, such as poverty, healthcare, and infrastructure, can lead to dire consequences for the population. For instance, in a healthcare crisis, timely interventions can save lives and prevent the spread of diseases. Therefore, it is imperative for governments to allocate resources and attention to the issues that demand immediate action.
Furthermore, addressing current challenges can lay the foundation for a more stable and prosperous future. By tackling pressing issues, governments can create a solid platform upon which to build long-term strategies. For example, investing in education today can lead to a more skilled and knowledgeable workforce in the future, which is essential for economic growth and innovation.
Critics may argue that focusing solely on immediate issues may lead to neglecting important long-term considerations, such as climate change or technological advancements. While these concerns are undoubtedly significant, they should not overshadow the immediate needs of the population. Striking a balance between addressing current problems and preparing for the future is essential.
Moreover, by demonstrating an ability to effectively manage present challenges, governments build trust and confidence among their citizens. This trust is crucial for garnering support for future initiatives and policies. If the population sees that their immediate concerns are being addressed, they are more likely to have faith in the government's ability to handle future challenges.
In conclusion, while it is important for governments to anticipate and prepare for the future, their primary focus should be on solving the immediate problems of today. This is not only a matter of urgency but also lays the groundwork for a stable and prosperous future. Striking a balance between present concerns and future planning is key to effective governance. Therefore, governments must prioritize the pressing needs of their citizens in order to build a stronger and more resilient society.
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 83
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether governments should prioritize solving t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ey are more likely to have faith in the governments ability to handle future challenges. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7579787234 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15125233788 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48670212766 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2620428022 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.947368421 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260638809872 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085932976249 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120073245846 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150057437495 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932706773766 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.1639044944 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.