Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The debate between addressing immediate concerns versus preparing for anticipated future problems is a pivotal consideration for governments worldwide. Striking the right balance between these priorities is essential for the long-term stability and prosperity of a nation. While addressing current issues is undoubtedly crucial, neglecting future concerns can lead to unforeseen crises. Therefore, it is imperative for governments to allocate resources judiciously and address both present challenges and future anticipations.
Tackling immediate problems like poverty, healthcare, and unemployment directly alleviates human suffering. This approach demonstrates empathy and responsiveness to the pressing needs of citizens. Promptly addressing current issues fosters social stability by preventing discontent, unrest, and social disparities from escalating. It helps maintain public trust in the government's ability to provide for its citizens. By addressing immediate concerns, governments can stimulate economic growth, creating a positive cycle that benefits both individuals and businesses.
Governments must engage in forward-thinking strategies to identify and mitigate potential future crises, such as environmental challenges, economic downturns, or public health emergencies. Focusing on anticipated issues allows for the implementation of preventative measures, reducing the likelihood and severity of future crises. For example, investing in renewable energy technology now can help mitigate future environmental issues. Addressing future problems demonstrates fiscal responsibility by preventing larger, costlier crises down the line. Investing in education, healthcare, and infrastructure today can yield significant savings in the future.
Governments should employ a strategic approach to resource allocation, ensuring that both immediate needs and future concerns are adequately addressed. This may involve prioritizing certain issues based on their urgency and long-term impact. They should also adopt adaptive policy frameworks that allow for the agile response to evolving circumstances. This includes maintaining a balance between short-term crisis management and long-term planning. Involving diverse stakeholders, including experts, communities, and advocacy groups, can help governments make informed decisions that balance immediate and future concerns effectively.
In conclusion, the dichotomy between addressing immediate problems and preparing for future challenges is a complex but critical consideration for governments. Striking the right balance requires judicious resource allocation, forward-thinking policies, and stakeholder engagement. Neglecting either aspect can lead to detrimental consequences for a nation's stability and prosperity. Therefore, governments should prioritize both present needs and future preparedness to ensure the well-being and resilience of their societies.
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 66
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
.... It helps maintain public trust in the governments ability to provide for its citizens. By...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... lead to detrimental consequences for a nations stability and prosperity. Therefore, go...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2547.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.75596816976 5.05705443957 134% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31601483402 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567639257294 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.59117977528 132% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5732567603 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.739130435 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3913043478 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206165017809 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605493678601 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564021671832 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124058222137 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194858843795 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 12.94 48.8420337079 26% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.63 12.1639044944 178% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.38706741573 135% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
.... It helps maintain public trust in the governments ability to provide for its citizens. By...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... lead to detrimental consequences for a nations stability and prosperity. Therefore, go...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2547.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.75596816976 5.05705443957 134% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31601483402 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567639257294 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.59117977528 132% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5732567603 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.739130435 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3913043478 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206165017809 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605493678601 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564021671832 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124058222137 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194858843795 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 12.94 48.8420337079 26% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.63 12.1639044944 178% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.38706741573 135% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.