In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are they.
Nowadays, cars play a substantial role in our lives. Therefore, there is a widely held view among people that the number of cars in the future will decrease. However, I personally subscribe to the view that the growth of producing cars will increase day to day mainly because with advancement in technology necessitate to using the cars and with increasing population in the societies utilization of cars will enhance.
First and possibly the most important reason I believe that technology will increase using cars. In fact, with producing environment-friendly cars, human right groups will not have any major concern about environmental pollution. For instance, in recent years, the production of cars that worked with clean energy such as Hydrogen have increased. Actually, these cars decrease contaminated particles in the air and increase the possibility of having a cleaner environment for the next generation. Also, my master thesis is about these cars and with diligence in this way, I will help my children for the chance of having a better environment. For this reason, I strongly believe that cars have an incredible part in economic of societies.
There is a further more subtle reason we must consider, which is the fact that with increasing population, transportation issues become a very vital factor for people because today’s time and convenience are the key factors in the countries. My own experience is also compelling example of this, when my family that lives in the Tabriz, for my graduation party, have come to the Tehran and we have diverse problem in the crowded city such as we are not able to visit differnet place because the public transportation just has been considered for special places. Accordingly, I think that the number of cars will increase because people are looking for amenity.
In a word, by taking all the aforementioned reasons into account we may draw the conclusion that absolutely demand of people to cars in the twenty years will increase. This is primarily due to the facts that cars are the most important factor in the advancement of countries such as economic status and with increasing population, demand to public facilities will enhance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- it is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 73
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are they. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 88
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree 76
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in on specific subject 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...s and with increasing population in the societies utilization of cars will enhance. Firs...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14206128134 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96584530791 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520891364903 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9289911839 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.857142857 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191473366183 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804824386399 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559327705667 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135557318514 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679160185711 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.