Many people believe that there will be more cars in the future. They cite the rise in the economy of people due to the age of industrialization. However, I believe that there will be fewer cars in use by the next twenty years or so. I feel this for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, I am of the opinion that the number of cars in use will decrease in the near future because of the high depletion rate of the fuel resources which has skyrocketed the prices of gas. For example, my uncle, who daily travels by car to his office, said that he is going to stop using his car for commute and will take a bus ride to the office because of the increasing prices of gas and oil. Thus, I think that due to the extensive use of fuel, it is the need of the hour to save the resources by opting for public transport more often. Furthermore, it is not wise to use private cars as it has led to huge traffic jams on the streets which directly affect the public.
Second of all, I feel that people will lessen their usage of cars in the years to come since there is an increasing awareness of the adverse effects of cars on the environment. For instance, due to the rising rate of global warming and pollution in the world, the government has made public transportation more economical. For this reason, many people who were complaining about the bad conditions of the public vehicles now have got the interest of officials and the experience of traveling has gotten much better. These reforms will help to curb pollution which will help decrease many health problems and promote the use of public mode of transportation.
In conclusion, I would like to say that though it seems very convincing that why people should not be using cars much due to the low availability of petroleum and increases pollution, many industrialists are working to overcome these problems. Moreover, many car companies are working on developing newer versions of engine that emits less polluting gases while some are even working on electric cars that using less or no fuel resources to run.
- TOEFL integrated writing Dutch painter Rembrandt 38
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOEFL integrated writing: communal online encyclopedia 76
- Passage Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of alt 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a daily'.
Suggestion: who is a daily
...e prices of gas. For example, my uncle, who daily travels by car to his office, said that...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56084656085 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60858366068 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6644681821 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317048976994 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123261848487 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133471408666 0.0737576698707 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206515481366 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961364732773 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.