In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Some people believe that the number of using car will increase in future as the number of population that is increasing every year. On the other hand, I believe that in next twenty years there will be less cars for the following reasons.
To begin with, the temperature and sea level are increasing every year due to the pollution. The major of increasing in temperature is the car. Vehicles emit a plenty of carbon dioxide that can destroy ozone. Therefore, nowadays, people concern more about this problem. They change their life style to use less car. In my experience, I have been to Canada. I seen that Canadian concern so much about global warming so they use a lot of bicycles.
In addition, there are improving in transportation around the world.
This is because the number of population are growing rapidly. consequently, government are required to improve transportation, such as building more sky-train. In Bangkok, the government are continuously construct metro and sky-train every years and also they have issued to regulation to control ticket price. Furthermore, They plan to expand the train line to rural area.
Lastly, there are developing in technology. In the past, people have to send the letter to communicate. Today, people, in contrast, can use their smart phone to contact. I believe that the technology will more advance so that people do not need to drive a car to company to work. Moreover, the logistic are improving. People do not have to drive a car to go shopping. The customer can shop via online. The life style in the future will change so much from today. As a result, the car will not essential anymore.
To sum up, global warming, improving in transportation and technology are the reasons why number of car using will decrease in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 3
- TPO-3 Integrated writing 3
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 60
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 60
- TOEFL T P O 3 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...that in next twenty years there will be less cars for the following reasons. To...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'saw'?
Suggestion: saw
...my experience, I have been to Canada. I seen that Canadian concern so much about glo...
^^^^
Line 11, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...mber of population are growing rapidly. consequently, government are required to improve tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 205, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'constructed'.
Suggestion: constructed
...angkok, the government are continuously construct metro and sky-train every years and als...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95709570957 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77228115668 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518151815182 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5114296141 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.5833333333 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.625 20.6045352989 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70833333333 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288318176033 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067567110089 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805483587036 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135107164796 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110122441004 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.6 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.