In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Plenty number of people are inclined toward the idea that the usage of car will increase in twenty years. However, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that people will not use cars in the next tewnty year more than they use it today. In my perspective, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today which I will pinpoint the most outstanding reason in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite reason worth mentioning is that with the developement of technology, many other facilities will emerge which make transportation for people more convienience. Nowadays, many people do not have access to subway which disable them to use it and because of that they have to use their own vehicle. In few years later, the governemt plans to grow the subway system to any part of the city and when it happens many people will be capable to use subway instead of their own cars. Therefore, they will not need their cars and after that they can sell it. Moreover, car vehicle is not fast enoght for travelling. In recent years, many fast trains and airplanes are used in trial which will be use in the near future. For example, people will use trains that has rapid speed instead of their cars. By this way, they will reach their destinantion in a shorter time and in other words, it prevents waste people time.
The further point is that the usage of car have a harmful effect on our environment. Since oil is found all around the world, great number of car company produce cars which work with oil fuels. These fuel emit chemical and toxic gases which are dangerous for people and in long terms will cause breathing problem for many people. Also, there are significant chance for the people who breath the air contain these gases to get untreatable diseases like cancer. For instance, doctors reveal that the number of the people who have cancer, are increased through the recent years. They believe that one of the reasons is the fuel that public vehicle use. Therefore, in the near future many people will bycicle our vehicle which will not harm our societies.
To make a long story short, based on the aformentioned arguments, it is extremely obvious that people will not use cars in twenty year later like today because not only the advancement of technology will remove personal cars but also cars make our living area dirty and polluted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- TOEFL Sample essay integrated essay from TPO5 3
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 73
- Agree or disagree At universities and college sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 73
- It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends 70
- 2 Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7215496368 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33799526964 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496368038741 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3403578638 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.631578947 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7368421053 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39907636489 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127169716274 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120041203542 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299713594425 0.150856017488 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172064202865 0.0645574589148 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.