Universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses.
University provides the fundamental knowledge that every graduate student can apply to their lives or career in the future. And recently, there has been an issue about whether graduate students should take public speaking courses. Some people claim that the course is unnecessary because not everyone will have to acquire this kind of skill. However, others believe that the course benefits students a lot since it can help students with various situation in the workplace. And I personally agree that students should be required to take public speaking courses for the following reasons.
To commence with, students are able to learn to build confidence through public speaking courses, which can help them after graduating. That is, taking the public speaking courses can help students gain confidence because they will learn to speak in public. This trains their ability to share their opinion without being shy or timid. So graduate students should possess this quality since this makes them be confident of their opinion and helps them tackle things in the workplace. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. My friend, Mike, took public speaking course during college, and now has already entered the workplace for several years. And he always has to share opinions with his colleagues or boss about the projects in the company. Every time when he has to share opinions, he remembers that his public speaking professor taught him to have confident during his speech. This really helps him a lot. Because of his confidence, he always wins colleagues compliments that he really did a great job. Therefore, I think graduate students should be required to take public speaking courses as the course helps them gain confidence.
Moreover, students can derive the skill of organizing via public speaking courses, and this also provides students with organized speaking later in the future. When delivering public speaking, students will have to speak in an organized way and with organized content. So by taking the public speaking courses, students can learn to have an organizing speech, which is good quality to possess and helpful to their future. Because in the future, especially when they enter the workplace, they will have tremendous opportunities to deliver speech in public, it is crucial that they have an organized thought to complete their speech. Thus, I think students should take public speaking courses since this can help organize their thought and have better ability to addressing a speech.
To sum up, with the reasons mentioned above, I firmly hold the view that graduation students should be required to take public speaking courses. That is not to say that other points of view are completely without merits. Still, I think the reasons I provided in favor of my position are much stronger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | derrick.lee | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | mohajeri4868 | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | elirad | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | Frequency | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | DivyaTS | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 73
- Universities should require every graduation student to take public speaking courses. 70
- TPO46 73
- TPO 31 73
- TPO 31 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, i think, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2394.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15948275862 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49492648089 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9710531771 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449342007987 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147223550362 0.076458572812 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145660261545 0.0737576698707 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324473069946 0.150856017488 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887367089373 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.