Universities should spend more money improving facilities, such as libraries, computer labs, than hiring famous teachers.
Some people contend that university should focus on the invent of infrastructure, as it is able to benefit students. However, I hold the opposite view that the priority of college is making sure the high standard of teachers it hires.
Admittedly, some might disprove me that university should regard improving facilities as their priority. This is because those infrastructures are definitely helpful to students. For instance, offering computer labs warrants that whenever students desired to gather around information for their researches or assignments, they could head to the labs, using the computer with convenience. Thus, they do not necessarily take their own laptops to the classes, which makes it unlikely for them to get distracted by the games or social platforms on it. However, in my opinion, with the development of smartphone, students now can search for almost everything useful on their phones, instead of using computers. Also, another disadvantage is the prohibitive cost of facilities. As a result, the money invented into facilities are in vain.
In great contrast, hiring famous teachers brings benefits for students, as teachers who are in high reputation enable to promote students' educational performance. In other word, students are accessible to those famous teachers with high-level abilities of tutoring students and experience in teaching. So, such teachers are capable of motivating student's interests to studying, which evokes the initiative in each one. To be more specific, when I stepped into the university, I always bypassed the diverse class, since I thought my major was quite boring and there was not any enthusiasm in classes. Nevertheless, I came to change when I had Miss Wang's financial classes. She was quite famous and professional in economy field in my city. She could teach those knowledge points in a vivid way by different methods, like telling a story, letting us to watch a related movie and so on. During that period, I was charmed by her tremendous skills in studying and felt her ingenuosity in tutoring each student. Affected by her, I have immersed myself in finance now and become a superior student in my college.
More importantly, famous teachers have positive effects on university. Teachers with high repute are always educational and professional in their own fields. They would work harder than others and dedicate much effort and time into researches, all of which would lead to a fact that they could attain and complete numerous achievements and essays that can be presented on journals. So, the more famous essays are in the top journal, the more reputation the university can receive. With the increasing repute, the university would be sponsored by government to augment its educational standards further more. Specifically, many famous universities in China, such Peking University and Tsinghua University, own the most outstanding professors. These universities' success is relevant tightly with the efforts from those famous teachers.
In order to promote its own reputation and gain the further benefits, college should spend money on hiring teachers.
In a nutshell, I maintain that college should invent capital on teachers rather than other meaningless things.
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- It is more fun to see a movie in the cinema with other people than see a movie at home 87
- It s important that we know about the events happening around the world though they do not affect our lives 90
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 79
- Do you think that young people should take several different kinds of job before they take a career in a long term 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...contend that university should focus on the invent of infrastructure, as it is able to ben...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a vivid way" with adverb for "vivid"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... She could teach those knowledge points in a vivid way by different methods, like telling a st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 749, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
... the most outstanding professors. These universities success is relevant tightly with the ef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2746.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38431372549 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94367475595 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 857.7 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0156088312 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.703703704 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07407407407 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291074984642 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688738276039 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614361512792 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134170668856 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406398358134 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 86.8835125448 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.