A university plans to develop a new research center in your country. Some people want a center for business research. Other people want a center for research in agriculture (farming). Which of these two kinds of research centers do you recommend for your country? Use specific reasons in your recommendation.
University, in my impression, is similar to a mini version of the real world since school founders want to create a place which neatly simulates society so that their students can experience what the world is like. A university in my country, with the same purpose, wants to ameliorate a new research center. However, people are considering whether the school should make it a business research or an agriculture one. As for me, building an agriculture research center is a good idea due to some rational reasons.
First of all, the agriculture research center aids in restricting the adverse impact of cultivation on the environment. Woefully, cultivation cannot avoid cutting down trees which increases soil infertility and leads to land erosion. Furthermore, using pesticide and herbicide is likely to contaminate the soil. Therefore, if the university decides to develop an agriculture center, it might be able to come up with proper solutions to prevent the hazardous influences of cultivation on residents’ lives. For example, there is an agricultural technique for growing crops without disturbing the soil called “no-till farming”. This advanced method helps decrease the amount of soil erosion and sandy soil phenomenon.
Second, it is essential for an overpopulated agricultural country to construct an agriculture center. Vietnam has been widely known as the world’s second largest rice exporter; also, exporting rice is the major field of Vietnam to increase GDP. Thereby, peasants are needed to be given enough land by the government to execute their work. Besides the fact that rice export is Vietnam’s main facet, expansion of cultivated land also supports citizens’ need for food as the population keeps growing. There is a concern among policy makers about how to meet the demand of population growth when natural resources are being shrunk. Hence, enlargement of the agriculture area is one of the most appropriate measures which lives up to this problem.
In conclusion, I strongly suggest the university create an agriculture research center and make an attempt at inventing new modern techniques to save the planet as well as advocate an agricultural country to cope with overpopulation.
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 76
- Some believe that politicians are the most influential people in the world while others believe scientists are the most influential Which side do you agree with and why Provide specific reasoning for your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Subjects such as art music and drama should be a part of every child s basic education 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38395415473 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03557828283 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618911174785 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3715829134 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.529411765 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311179484272 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980072982093 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099260647388 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191835748986 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875232609692 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.