There is a well-known saying: 'do not judge a book by its cover', with which I quite agree. So similarly, I firmly believe we should not judge one's personality by his or her clothes.
To begin with, I understand that some people would argue that clothing styles can reflect individuals' preferences, thereby indicating their inside character. When seeing people with clean and tidy clothes, it is more likely that they are serious and have a positive attitude to their life. And youngsters with trendy clothes are more likely to have stronger sociable skills and outgoing character.
Reasonable as the above argument may seem, in my opinion, it is superficial and lacks a deep understanding of the relation between the inside and the outside of humans. The point is that people are complicated and social animals with rich emotions, which make their choices for clothes be influenced by many other vital factors besides their own characters. For one thing, their commercial situation is quite dominant when purchasing clothes. For example, many young ladies are quite open-minded to accept the latest trend, but because of low incomes they tend to choose cheaper but outdated ones. Can we regard them as stubborn people who refuse novel things? I do not think so. For another thing, the outside environment can be very influential. To be more specific, sometimes we tend to choose similar styles compared with our friends' or family's in order to gain a sense of belonging. In that case, these clothes have nothing to do with our willingness and at least only reflect the features of people close to us.
Furthermore, everyone has the right to choose how they dress up themselves regardless of others' thoughts. People who encourage individuals to judge individuals by their outlooks and clothes have made no positive contribution but only spread prejudgments and biases about some special clothing styles. I can take miniskirts as a perfect example. It is not uncommon that girls with miniskirts are judged by strangers in public since they tend attach some superficial meaning to such clothes, but the fact is that the reason that those girls are wearing them is solely out of the hot wealther. In addition, some thieves usually dress quite appropriately to mislead others.
To sum up, it is biased to judge people by their clothes.
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important Which do you prefer and why 88
- Which do you prefer an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 83
- people should help charities by giving extra money of their wealth 83
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 42
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important problems affecting our society today could be solved within our lifetime 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...y, I firmly believe we should not judge ones personality by his or her clothes. T...
^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clothing styles can reflect individuals preferences, thereby indicating their in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, look, may, similarly, so, well, another thing, at least, for example, in addition, for another thing, for one thing, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08266666667 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70418408315 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570666666667 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7071388474 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.315789474 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26315789474 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101848568254 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304929454151 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425715400653 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682935067805 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271997422396 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.