whales
The reading and lecture are both about humpback whales, which is a kind of animal to migrate long-distance for finding food or mate. The passage presents three explanations to posit how these whales can migrate and navigate to the destination by following the stars. The professor, however, refutes all of those explanations.
To begin with, the author of reading claims that whales are genuine and have great intelligent brains among animals, so humpback whales can use stars to navigate like a human sailor. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this claim by mentioning that some other animals like birds and ducks have this ability, whereas they are not intelligence. Also, she states that animals utilize their intrinsic skills to find correct ways.
Secondly, the article posits that when whales commence to migrate, obey the straight line, and return in the right way, so they use the external object as a clue to navigate. However, the professor maintains an opposites opinion that in the brain of some animals is a space which is name biomagnetic part. They use this part to navigate rather than stars.
Third, the reading mentions that whales have a particular behavior, which is spy-hopping; it is a rare act to use watch stars. The professor, however, cast doubt on this claim by stating that this behavior is unique, but whales do it even in the morning when stars do not exist in the sky. Besides, other animals like sharks repeatedly do this act since they want to look for hunt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-30 | S M Naimul Mamun | 60 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | ShayesteTR | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-10 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | farnaz9494 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | farnaz9494 | 60 | view |
- asteroids 71
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 3
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. do you agree? 76
- about finding fossil 83
- if people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the destination by following the stars. The professor, however, refutes all of thos...
^^^
Line 9, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opposites'' or 'opposite's'?
Suggestion: opposites'; opposite's
...te. However, the professor maintains an opposites opinion that in the brain of some anima...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 251.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00796812749 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57708263335 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577689243028 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3710461938 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223383485083 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082337509393 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103045425787 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144141317506 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347718989568 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.