When needing to discuss upset or controversial issues, some people like to use email or text messages. Others like to use phones or voice-messages. Which do you prefer and why?
When people want to convey some messages to others, some people will like to use email or text especially the upset or controversial issues, whereas others love to direct talking to them or use the voice-messages. In my perspectives, I believe using text to deliver the messages is greater than voice if the contents are about upset or controversial issues. I will explore the reasons in the following.
First of all, text messages are much clearer than talking when the issue has potential chances to have fights or let someone feels upset. For example, every time when I have the fight with my girlfriend, I will stop our talking and transfer to use text. Most time we cannot clearly express our feeling in fights because both of us always have a lot of ideas which we want to say. At that moment, we only present what our individual own want to say but do listen little to each other. Thus, I suppose that when people have similar situations, text messages are the best way could pass the information to others and have sure that they will definitely receive our messages.
The second benefit of taking text messages is that we could decline the conflict in upset or controversial issues. According to the research conducted by Executive Yuan in our country, text information could reduce the chance of quarreling by 20% in work. The phenomenon has been stimulating many scholars, starting to study what is the real factors to cause such a decrease. In fact, the contributing factor lies in the fact that text messages could largely deduct the time of face to face of different opinion's people, and such time let people have time to calm down. Besides, when people try to write the messages in text, they will unconsciously choose polite words. The phenomenon is not rare. Many people in different countries have the same inclination. Such would be the direct evidence that bears witness to the fact that text messages are good to handle such situations.
To sum up, in normal time, there is no difference between text and voice messages. However, when the upset or controversial issues are discussed, I am of the opinion that text messages is the best choice.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 76
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds. 50
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 86
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xplore the reasons in the following. First of all, text messages are much cle...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill definitely receive our messages. The second benefit of taking text messag...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are good to handle such situations. To sum up, in normal time, there is no d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, whereas, for example, i suppose, in fact, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81016042781 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63084349028 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516042780749 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0206482093 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9444444444 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292851800936 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907224446236 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111895681612 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214118741442 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137071912969 0.0645574589148 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.